2008
DOI: 10.1623/hysj.53.5.1090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fit-for-purpose analysis of uncertainty using split-sampling evaluations

Abstract: An uncertainty assessment method for evaluating models, the Sources of UNcertainty GLobal Assessment using Split SamplES (SUNGLASSES), is presented, which assesses predictive uncertainty that is not captured by parameter or other input uncertainties. The method uses the split sample approach to generate a quantitative estimate of the fit-for-purpose of the model, thus focusing on the purpose for which the model is used. It operates by comparing the output to be used for decision making to its observed counterp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of uncertainties associated with model structure, input, parameter and output, the model prediction is not a certain value and should be represented with a confidence range (Gupta et al ., ; Beven, ; Van Griensven et al ., ; Yang et al ., ; Zhang et al ., ; Shen et al ., ). In this study, the SWAT model was used to simulate runoff and then, to analyze the impacts of land use on annual and monthly runoff in wet, average and dry years through scenario simulation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of uncertainties associated with model structure, input, parameter and output, the model prediction is not a certain value and should be represented with a confidence range (Gupta et al ., ; Beven, ; Van Griensven et al ., ; Yang et al ., ; Zhang et al ., ; Shen et al ., ). In this study, the SWAT model was used to simulate runoff and then, to analyze the impacts of land use on annual and monthly runoff in wet, average and dry years through scenario simulation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of parameter uncertainty will lead to uncertainties in model output (e.g., carbon fluxes). Therefore, a proper sensitivity and uncertainty analysis is preferable because it produces model simulations with a confidence range (band) instead of specific output [ Beven , ; Van Griensven et al ., ; Ng et al ., ]. In this sense, it is critical to investigate the parameter uncertainty and quantify its effects on the model output especially for large complex ecological models [ Keenan et al ., ; Wang et al ., ; Richardson et al ., ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and has been used to predict hydrologic responses at ungauged watersheds. SWAT has an advantage when applied to large-scale ungauged watersheds by adapting auto-calibration tools, such as Parameter Solution (ParaSol) [36], Sources of Uncertainty Global Assessment using Split Samples (SUNGLASSES) [37,38], Shuffled Complex Evolution-University of Arizona (SCE-UA) [36] and SWAT-calibration and uncertainty procedures (CUP) [39]. For example, Park et al [40] and Lee et al [41] tested the applicability of SWAT to small watersheds and performed the estimation of runoff curve coefficients, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%