2017
DOI: 10.1088/1681-7575/aa7cb7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fisheye camera method for spatial non-uniformity corrections in luminous flux measurements with integrating spheres

Abstract: This paper presents a fisheye camera method for determining spatial non-uniformity corrections in luminous flux measurements with integrating spheres. Using a fisheye camera installed into a port of an integrating sphere, the relative angular intensity distribution of the lamp under test is determined. This angular distribution is used for calculating the spatial non-uniformity correction for the lamp when combined with the spatial responsivity data of the sphere. The method was validated by comparing it to a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On average, the relative deviation between the fisheye camera method and goniophotometer method in determining spatial corrections for the artefacts tested was only 0.05 %. The fisheye camera method has been described in [Kokka 2017] and the results of the validation with several measurement facilities in [Kokka 2019]. Figure 5 shows a photograph taken with a fisheye camera through a port of an integrating sphere illuminated by an LED lamp under test and the resolved angular intensity distribution of that lamp.…”
Section: Fisheye Camera Methods For Integrating Spheresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On average, the relative deviation between the fisheye camera method and goniophotometer method in determining spatial corrections for the artefacts tested was only 0.05 %. The fisheye camera method has been described in [Kokka 2017] and the results of the validation with several measurement facilities in [Kokka 2019]. Figure 5 shows a photograph taken with a fisheye camera through a port of an integrating sphere illuminated by an LED lamp under test and the resolved angular intensity distribution of that lamp.…”
Section: Fisheye Camera Methods For Integrating Spheresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowing the geometric relation between the system components, it is possible to calculate the intensity distribution within the angular range of the screen or construct the full intensity distribution by rotating a light source with wide angular pattern. The extreme case of this method is to use a 2π camera (fisheye) on the wall aperture of an integrating sphere [49].…”
Section: Geometrical Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fisheye method was originally developed for spatial non-uniformity corrections in luminous flux measurements with integrating spheres, but it can be also used for fast measurement of light source angular distributions [42,49]. The method needs to be calibrated for the angular responsivity of the sphere with a light source of known angular distribution, determined by the goniometric measurement (see figure 3).…”
Section: Geometrical Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid the laborious goniophotometric measurements, alternative methods have been proposed to take into account spatial non-uniformities of integrating spheres. These methods include the use of a six-port integrating sphere [11,12], a directional luminous flux standard lamp [13], or fisheye-lens cameras [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, the fisheye camera method [15] for determining spatial non-uniformity corrections is validated by measuring the relative angular intensity distributions of six LED lamps in eight integrating spheres using the camera method, and comparing the correction factors with those obtained using five goniophotometers of different types. In addition to studying the spatial correction factors for luminous flux measurements, the angular intensity distributions obtained using the two methods are also directly compared.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%