Fisheries and fishery resources of New York Bight / J.L. McHugh.

McHugh, J. L.

doi:10.5962/bhl.title.4184

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There are similarities between sibling relationships of deaf children and those of children with other disabilities. The effects of family size replicate previous research on sibling relationships of children with other disabilities (Grossman, 1972; McHugh, 1999), indicating better outcomes for children in larger families. Similarly, differential parental treatment of children with and without disabilities has been identified as a predictor of sibling relationships across disabilities (McHale & Pawletko, 1992; Stoneman & Brody, 1993; Volling & Belsky, 1992).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 81%

“…For example, gender was one characteristic affecting sibling relationships: Older sisters of deaf children suffered adverse effects because they frequently provided too much care for the deaf sibling (Atkins, 1987; Luterman, 1996). In contrast, older hearing brothers were less affected, possibly because gender socialization of boys does not stress caretaking (Luterman, 1996; McHugh, 1999). Other studies confirm the importance of family characteristics.…”

Section: Siblings Of Deaf Childrenmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Sibling relationships for deaf children: The impact of child and family characteristics.

Bat-Chava¹,

Martin

2002

Rehabilitation Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To examine factors that affect relationships between deaf children who use cochlear implants or hearing aids and their hearing siblings. Study Design: Qualitative analysis of interview data from parents of deaf children. Participants: Parents of 29 deaf children with at least 1 sibling; 20 children used cochlear implants and 9 used hearing aids. Main Outcome Measure: Quality of deaf-hearing sibling relationships as assessed by an ordinal scale developed by the authors. Results: Birth order, family size, parents' anxiety about deafness, and negative comparisons by parents of hearing and deaf siblings were key factors in sibling relationships. Conclusions: Family context is important in understanding experiences of deaf children and their hearing siblings. The model replaces assumptions of hearing loss as individual disability with an emphasis on the social determinants of managing differences in siblings' hearing status.When examining children with disabilities, research has typically focused on the adjustment of the child with a disability, with less attention paid to how the presence of the child affects the adjustment of others in the child's environment. A recently proposed family systems approach attributes children's functioning to the individual characteristics of the child with a disability as well as the child's social environment (Stoneman & Brody, 1993). Viewed from this perspective, when one member of the family has a disability, all members of the household Yael Bat-Chava and Daniela Martin, League for the Hard of Hearing,

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 81%

Section: Siblings Of Deaf Childrenmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sibling relationships for deaf children: The impact of child and family characteristics.

Bat-Chava¹,

Martin

2002

Rehabilitation Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The reader will notice in the definition given by Secretary McHugh includes the disclaimer, "Participation in the spiritual dimension of the CSF2 program is strictly voluntary." 73 In a memorandum that is directive in nature, this particular caveat stood out. It is reflective of the highly sensitive nature of spirituality both personally and in the public arena.…”

Section: Sensitivitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Millennial Generation Spirituality and Religion in the United States Army

Peck¹

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS.

show abstract

Growth of juvenile Mercenaria mercenaria and the effect of resuspended bottom sediments

1984

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fisheries and fishery resources of New York Bight / J.L. McHugh.

Abstract: Atlantic sea scallop 40 42 Atlantic bay scallop 40 43 American lobster 41 44 Swordfish 42 45 Striped bass 43 46 Conch 44 47 Northern puffer 44 48 Tilefish 45

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Sibling relationships for deaf children: The impact of child and family characteristics.

Sibling relationships for deaf children: The impact of child and family characteristics.

Millennial Generation Spirituality and Religion in the United States Army

Growth of juvenile Mercenaria mercenaria and the effect of resuspended bottom sediments

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About