2017
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2017.2750800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fisher Vectors for PolSAR Image Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, divergent polarization decomposition features can be computed with given specific scattering basis sets [13][14][15] or different eigenvalue decomposition [16,17]. Second, features are extracted with machine-learning and computer-vision methods as in [18][19][20]. More recently, with the idea of learning theory, Refs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, divergent polarization decomposition features can be computed with given specific scattering basis sets [13][14][15] or different eigenvalue decomposition [16,17]. Second, features are extracted with machine-learning and computer-vision methods as in [18][19][20]. More recently, with the idea of learning theory, Refs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we propose two modifications to the work presented in [Redolfi et al, 2017]. The first one is with respect to the selection of the pdf of equation 5.…”
Section: Proposed Extensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main contributions of this work are the extension of a previously presented method [Redolfi et al, 2017], adding the comparison of different probability distributions functions for the eFVs encoding and different similarity measures between the eFVs to generate a raw classification of pixels. The hypotheses of this work are that although the theoretical distribution of the data follows a Wishart distribution, with Gaussian distributions competitive results can be obtained and also that using other types of similarity measures the results in the classification can be improved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the above methods incorporate the prior knowledge to capture SAR image features, and these features are poor generalization. Afterwards, with the purpose of achieving stronger features, there has been increasing interests in the middlelevel feature learning methods based on machine learning techniques, i.e., sparse representation [12], fisher vector (FV) [13], superpixel-level FV [14] and multi-scale local fisher patterns [15]. Although these feature descriptors characterize SAR images better than the low-level features, they require lots of prior knowledge for feature extraction and are not suitable for HR SAR image processing under amounts of SAR data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%