2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fish shrinking, energy balance and climate change

Quentin Queiros,
David J. McKenzie,
Gilbert Dutto
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, experimental evidence has questioned the ability of fishes to significantly increase absolute energy intake at elevated temperatures, even if available to the individual, due to an inability to ramp up evolutionarily determined maximal predation rates: For instance, predatory fishes which typically deploy a feast and famine approach to foraging 110 , may be forced to reduce meal sizes to protect aerobic scope due to the exponential costs associated with digestion of large prey 34 , 52 , 111 113 , and may be unable to significantly increase capture rates of (smaller) prey 86 , thereby placing a natural upper limit to energy acquisition. Indeed, recent empirical work have shown 2–3-fold increases in energy expenditure needed to capture smaller prey and suggested that this bottom-up effect may help explain patterns of shrinking in wild fishes 114 , 115 . Similarly, continuous grazers such as herbivorous reef fishes typically spend the majority of their waking time foraging under current day temperatures (some more than 80% 116 118 ), likely hindering a further 20–40% increase in foraging effort and energy acquisition to match warming-induced metabolic demands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, experimental evidence has questioned the ability of fishes to significantly increase absolute energy intake at elevated temperatures, even if available to the individual, due to an inability to ramp up evolutionarily determined maximal predation rates: For instance, predatory fishes which typically deploy a feast and famine approach to foraging 110 , may be forced to reduce meal sizes to protect aerobic scope due to the exponential costs associated with digestion of large prey 34 , 52 , 111 113 , and may be unable to significantly increase capture rates of (smaller) prey 86 , thereby placing a natural upper limit to energy acquisition. Indeed, recent empirical work have shown 2–3-fold increases in energy expenditure needed to capture smaller prey and suggested that this bottom-up effect may help explain patterns of shrinking in wild fishes 114 , 115 . Similarly, continuous grazers such as herbivorous reef fishes typically spend the majority of their waking time foraging under current day temperatures (some more than 80% 116 118 ), likely hindering a further 20–40% increase in foraging effort and energy acquisition to match warming-induced metabolic demands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, sardines from the Mediterranean Sea have shown a drastic decline in body condition, size and life expectancy in the past two decades (Saraux et al, 2019). The major driver proposed is the shift of sardine diet towards smaller planktonic prey observed in the Gulf of Lions due to multi-factorial environmental changes (Feuillolley et al 2020, Brosset et al, 2016), leading to lower foraging efficiency and a reallocation trade-off toward reproduction instead of survival (Beauvieux et al, 2022; Queiros et al, 2019, 2024). Consequently, individuals at the end of the reproduction period may rely on low energetic reserves to survive the end of the winter period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%