Fishes and Forestry 2004
DOI: 10.1002/9780470995242.ch17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fish‐Forestry Interactions in Oregon, Washington and Alaska, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Oregon Coast Range physiographic province is an economically and ecologically important region of the Pacific Northwest. The forestlands of this region are a major source of timber and a critical habitat for salmon and other endangered species (Hall et al 2004). As second growth forests mature in the Oregon Coastal ecoregion, there is increased interest in developing best management practices reflecting knowledge of key ecological mechanisms and linkages in streams .…”
Section: The Oregon Coast Range Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Oregon Coast Range physiographic province is an economically and ecologically important region of the Pacific Northwest. The forestlands of this region are a major source of timber and a critical habitat for salmon and other endangered species (Hall et al 2004). As second growth forests mature in the Oregon Coastal ecoregion, there is increased interest in developing best management practices reflecting knowledge of key ecological mechanisms and linkages in streams .…”
Section: The Oregon Coast Range Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Pacific Coastal Region of the United States contains large tracts of economically important forestlands that also serve as critical stream habitat for anadromous fish Hall et al 2004). As efforts expand to manage and restore salmon populations, there is an increased interest in developing biological criteria that can be used to monitor stream sediment conditions .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More broadly, studies across the Pacific Northwest report localized responses of stream temperature and flow to either climate change or forest harvest, due to contrasting features in streams (e.g, for temperature [ 26 , 54 ]; for flow [ 27 , 38 ]). Local responses of fish to forest harvest have also been commonly described (see reviews [ 55 56 ]). Although our results contrast with other research of fish responses to climate change, which typically reports relatively uniform responses by stream-fish across landscapes [ 57 60 ], and for a wide-range of other biota as well [ 14 , 61 63 ], more recently, increasing attention has been drawn to the role of local variability in physical habitat as an important player in mediating the effects of climate change [ 8 , 16 , 18 , 64 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much attention, or even blame, has been directed toward landscape activities (e.g., agriculture, forestry), which may often be the only prominent anthropogenic activities in otherwise pristine catchments with salmonid populations, for their potential role in the warming of freshwater, and therefore, their potential role of being the reason or at least further exaggerating the negative trend on thermal habitat suitability [137,138]. It has been long recognized that such landscape activities, when poorly conducted and/or especially when occurring without appropriate mitigations such as appropriate riparian zones, can indeed have a significant and long-term warming effect on freshwater streams [139,140]. On the contrary, when landscape activities are undertaken on a moderate scale with mitigations (e.g., harvesting of 7% of a stream basin in the Catamaran Brook catchment, NB, Canada), the effects of freshwater warming have not been observed [141,142].…”
Section: Management and Conservation Actions In Response To A Warming...mentioning
confidence: 99%