2014
DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201402073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis: Morphology, Phase Transformation, and Carbon‐Layer Growth of Iron‐Based Catalysts

Abstract: The morphological, phase transformations and carbon‐layer growth for unpromoted and K‐promoted iron catalysts were investigated over time during Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. Catalysts were activated in CO for 24 h, which transformed hematite into a mixture containing 93 % iron carbide and 7 % magnetite for the unpromoted catalyst and 81 % iron carbide and 19 % magnetite for the K‐promoted catalyst. Initially, the activated catalysts had high CO conversions (≈85 %); however, the conversions decreased to approxima… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of the reaction approach, the active sites on the iron catalyst should be divided into two types. One is probably an oxidic iron phase, which appears to be active for the RWGS reaction (pathway 1) by abstraction of an O atom in CO 2 by a H radical to form CO. Another is the well‐known iron carbide phase (Fe 5 C 2 ) for the dissociation of CO to carbon–carbon propagation by FTS (pathway 3) …”
Section: Results Measured Over Supported and Unsupported Iron‐based Csupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the basis of the reaction approach, the active sites on the iron catalyst should be divided into two types. One is probably an oxidic iron phase, which appears to be active for the RWGS reaction (pathway 1) by abstraction of an O atom in CO 2 by a H radical to form CO. Another is the well‐known iron carbide phase (Fe 5 C 2 ) for the dissociation of CO to carbon–carbon propagation by FTS (pathway 3) …”
Section: Results Measured Over Supported and Unsupported Iron‐based Csupporting
confidence: 69%
“…One is probably an oxidic iron phase, which appears to be active for the RWGS reaction (pathway 1) by abstraction of an Oa tom in CO 2 by aHr adical to form CO. Another is the well-known iron carbide phase (Fe 5 C 2 )f or the dissociation of CO to carbon-carbon propagation by FTS (pathway3). [32,33] As illustrated in Scheme1,t he hydrogenation of CO 2 over the iron catalystp roduces products or intermediates, including CO, water,a nd hydrocarbons. CO is the reactioni ntermediate formed in the first step by the RWGS reaction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some researchers have reported that FTS activity either increases [2,6,13] or passes through a maximum as a function of potassium loading [11,20], others have found that potassium either has no effect on the activity for FTS [21] or suppresses it [17,20]. In our previous study [22], we reported the activity/stability of an unpromoted and a 2 % potassium promoted iron catalyst during FTS, and the activities of these catalysts decreased in a similar manner with time on stream.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Mössbauer effect spectroscopy is a useful technique that can provide quantitative information on the fractions of various iron phases present in the catalyst samples [22]. The iron phase composition of unpromoted and various potassium promoter loaded iron catalysts, after carburization and during FTS, as determined by fitting the Möss-bauer spectra at 20 K measurements, are listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation