2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.red.2015.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fiscal stimulus and distortionary taxation

Abstract: We quantify the fiscal multipliers in response to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009. We extend the benchmark medium-scale New Keynesian model, allowing for credit-constrained households, the zero lower bound, government capital, and distortionary taxation. The posterior yields modestly positive short-run multipliers around 0.53 and modestly negative long-run multipliers around-0.36. We compare and relate recent literature multiplier calculations to ours. We explain the central empirical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
79
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
8
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25 He obtains a positive and significant response of the ex ante real interest rate, which is in line with this study and a negative response of inflation, which is not the case here. Perotti (2005) estimates the cumulative response of consumption to be negative in the fourth quarter but positive in the twelfth quarter.…”
Section: Government Spendingsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…25 He obtains a positive and significant response of the ex ante real interest rate, which is in line with this study and a negative response of inflation, which is not the case here. Perotti (2005) estimates the cumulative response of consumption to be negative in the fourth quarter but positive in the twelfth quarter.…”
Section: Government Spendingsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…17 16 The model share of taxes in the total tax revenue are 0.49, 0.21, 0.30 for labour, capital and consumption tax respectively. For the period from 1987:Q2 to 2011:Q1 data show these averages to be 0.46 (42,52), 0.25 (20,27), 0.30 (25,32) -brackets show minimum and maximum values respectively. 17 We follow Harrison and Oomen (2010) and set the means of investment shocks at a higher level.…”
Section: Prior Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cogan et al (2010) make use of a DSGE model to examine the effect of government purchases, tax cuts and transfers under the ARRA on US output. Drautzburg and Uhlig (2011) conduct a similar analysis of the ARRA in the context of a DSGE model with credit-constrained households, distortionary taxation and the zero lower bound on nominal interest rates. Coenen et al (2012), Forni et al (2009) and Cwik and Wieland (2011) examine the effects of EERP using estimated DSGE models for the euro area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coenen et al (2012) calculate fiscal multipliers in seven popular DSGE models and conclude that the output multiplier can be far in excess of 1. Cogan et al (2010) and Drautzburg and Uhlig (2015) conclude, in contrast, that the multiplier is likely less than unity. Leeper et al (2011) use Bayesian prior predictive analysis not to produce a point estimate of the multiplier but rather to provide plausible bounds on it in a generalized DSGE framework.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 96%