2018
DOI: 10.1111/iere.12308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Output and Welfare Effects of Government Spending Shocks Over the Business Cycle

Abstract: This article studies the output and welfare effects of shocks to government spending in a medium‐scale DSGE model. Our model considers both government consumption and investment and allows for a variety of fiscal financing mechanisms. We use the model to address several questions pertaining to the magnitude and state dependence of both the output and welfare effects of changes in government spending. Countercyclical government spending is undesirable as a general policy prescription, but we highlight situation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(143 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It would be premature to suggest strong and precise recommendations for the current macroeconomic situation of the Bosnian or the Federation’s economy based on just one model specification. It should be noted, however, that in a recent study with a New Keynesian DSGE model, Sims and Wolff ( 2018 ) show that countercyclical fiscal policies are more successful when using productive public investment instead of public consumption. Since due to lack of data our model does not incorporate potential GDP, we cannot explore these effects in our model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It would be premature to suggest strong and precise recommendations for the current macroeconomic situation of the Bosnian or the Federation’s economy based on just one model specification. It should be noted, however, that in a recent study with a New Keynesian DSGE model, Sims and Wolff ( 2018 ) show that countercyclical fiscal policies are more successful when using productive public investment instead of public consumption. Since due to lack of data our model does not incorporate potential GDP, we cannot explore these effects in our model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…( 34) that the optimal government expenditure to output ratio degenerates to zero. Second, if government spending provides households with utility and enters additively in the utility function (rather than the production function) as in Sims and Wolff (2018) and Boehm (2020), the optimal ratio of government expenditure is solely positively related to the extent of utility-generating government spending. The detailed proof is available from the author upon request.…”
Section: Optimal Fiscal Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies found that the results could be sensitive to changes in specifications or estimation methods. Model-based studies find different results, includingCanzoneri, Collard, Dellas, and Diba (2016) that show higher but relatively short-lived multipliers during recessions; andSims and Wolff (2018) that highlight that multiplier can be mildly procyclical 3. For instance, recent empirical findings highlighted evidence of higher multipliers, ranging from 1.5 to 2.5 at the zero lower bound for Japan(Miyamoto, Nguyen, and Sergeyev, 2018) and around 1.5 for in the United States(Ramey and Zubairy, 2018).©International Monetary Fund.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%