2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2015.08.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fiscal policy under deflationary gap and long-run stagnation: Reinterpretation of Keynesian multipliers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, only the second equation in , ∂ c /∂( p 1 g 1 ), is relevant and equals 0.26. This value equals that obtained by Murota and Ono (), where they treat a closed economy and use the same data set as the present one.…”
Section: Own and Spillover Effects Of Parameter Changessupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, only the second equation in , ∂ c /∂( p 1 g 1 ), is relevant and equals 0.26. This value equals that obtained by Murota and Ono (), where they treat a closed economy and use the same data set as the present one.…”
Section: Own and Spillover Effects Of Parameter Changessupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Murota and Ono () consider a preference for deposit holdings and show secular stagnation, zero nominal interest rates and excess reserves of commercial banks to appear. Murota and Ono () reformulate the model and propose a Keynesian‐multiplier‐like analysis with quite different implications from the conventioanl implications. Illing et al .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This increase in consumption also raises the price change rate, which increases consumption again. See Murota and Ono (2015) for details. 34 Using the second equation of (A7), I find that the RHS of (A8) is decreasing in g: which implies that sufficiently large g violates (A8).…”
Section: Murotamentioning
confidence: 99%
“… See Ono, Ogawa, and Yoshida () for empirical support of this assumption and Ono (, Chapter 1) and Murota and Ono , p. 598) for discussions about the validity of this assumption. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation