2018
DOI: 10.18559/ebr.2018.4.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fiscal Consequences of the Abolition of Sugar Levies

Abstract: From October 2017 the European Union envisages the abolition of the socalled sugar quotas and minimum prices for buying sugar beet. As a consequence of these changes the sugar levies paid by the sugar factories of the Member States will cease to apply. The article identifies the fiscal effects of the abolition of these levies. The European Union and the Member States will lose some of their budget revenues. The structure of Member States' burdens for GNI payments will also change as well as their operating bal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, Bulgaria, Ireland, Latvia, Portugal, and Slovenia ceased sugar production in the first years, while Greece, Spain, Italy and Slovakia significantly reduced their production. The negative consequences of the reform were also felt by Poland, where by the end of the 2009/2010 marketing year, 38 out of 56 sugar factories were closed [Cieślukowski and Mutascu 2018]. In the entire EU, the number of sugar beet growers has significantly decreased.…”
Section: Common Agricultural Policy Instruments For the Sugar Market mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, Bulgaria, Ireland, Latvia, Portugal, and Slovenia ceased sugar production in the first years, while Greece, Spain, Italy and Slovakia significantly reduced their production. The negative consequences of the reform were also felt by Poland, where by the end of the 2009/2010 marketing year, 38 out of 56 sugar factories were closed [Cieślukowski and Mutascu 2018]. In the entire EU, the number of sugar beet growers has significantly decreased.…”
Section: Common Agricultural Policy Instruments For the Sugar Market mentioning
confidence: 99%