The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1666996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First-trimester Combined Screening Test for Aneuploidies in Brazilian Unselected Pregnancies: Diagnostic Performance of Fetal Medicine Foundation Algorithm

Abstract: The combined test of aneuploidy screening showed a detection rate inferior to those described in the literature for a higher FP rate.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(35 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with those previous studies for VTS pregnancies, 16‐20 in our study, most of NIPT positive cases were false‐positive and the PPV was lower than those described in the studies for ART singleton and twin pregnancies, 14,31 but similar to conventional prenatal screening (2%‐8%) 32‐35 . Even so, the proportion of positive results was still relatively low.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Consistent with those previous studies for VTS pregnancies, 16‐20 in our study, most of NIPT positive cases were false‐positive and the PPV was lower than those described in the studies for ART singleton and twin pregnancies, 14,31 but similar to conventional prenatal screening (2%‐8%) 32‐35 . Even so, the proportion of positive results was still relatively low.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…An increase in the intermediate risk group (2012/13: 15.3 % vs. 2019: 22.4 %, p = 0.001) could be particularly observed and might, at least in part, be explained by a lower utilization of additional serum biochemistry with the possibility of further risk reduction in group 1, as mentioned above. Because it is a tertiary referral center, the proportion of patients belonging to the high-risk group (11.2 %) is considerably higher compared to other studies [22,23], and this should be kept in mind.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%