2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2009.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First seismic imaging results of tectonically complex structures at shallow depths beneath the northwest Canterbury Plains, New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(22 reference statements)
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 240 channel seismic recording system with single 30 Hz geophones spaced at 5 m intervals and explosive/ hammer sources every 10/5 m yielded nominal 30/120-fold data with 2.5 m subsurface sampling. A data-adaptive processing scheme that included time-and space-variant spectral balancing, custom static corrections and mutes, frequencydistance (F-X) deconvolution, dip-moveout (DMO) corrections, and finite difference time migration [Yilmaz, 2001] was Further details on the data acquisition strategy are provided by Dorn et al [2010]. Because it was inappropriate to detonate explosions within the town of Sheffield, a hammer source was used at x = 6.8 to 8.3 km along seismic line S2 (see Figures 6c and 6f).…”
Section: Seismic Reflection Data Acquisition and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A 240 channel seismic recording system with single 30 Hz geophones spaced at 5 m intervals and explosive/ hammer sources every 10/5 m yielded nominal 30/120-fold data with 2.5 m subsurface sampling. A data-adaptive processing scheme that included time-and space-variant spectral balancing, custom static corrections and mutes, frequencydistance (F-X) deconvolution, dip-moveout (DMO) corrections, and finite difference time migration [Yilmaz, 2001] was Further details on the data acquisition strategy are provided by Dorn et al [2010]. Because it was inappropriate to detonate explosions within the town of Sheffield, a hammer source was used at x = 6.8 to 8.3 km along seismic line S2 (see Figures 6c and 6f).…”
Section: Seismic Reflection Data Acquisition and Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AGC, automatic gain control; DMO, dip-moveout; FD, finite difference; F-X, frequency-space; NMO normal-moveout; CVS, constantvelocity stacks. The principles of these processes are described by Yilmaz [2001], and their application to the Canterbury Plains data is outlined by Dorn et al [2010]. gently dipping, to undulating reflection unit Qo, which is only seen northwest of x ≈ 6.0 km and southeast of x ≈ 12.0 km.…”
Section: Significant Reflection Packages and Low-reflectivity Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1c with the goal of mapping the faults and folds underlying the northwest Canterbury Plains Dorn et al (2009Dorn et al ( , 2010. We also took advantage of the four short seismic reflection lines M1-M4 acquired by Finnemore (2004) and the northern end of the industry seismic reflection line IPE4 described by Jongens et al (1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4; Dorn et al, 2009Dorn et al, , 2010; poor resolution in the uppermost~20 m is a consequence of source-generated noise (Robertsson et al, 1996) and generally reduced fold (i.e., subsurface coverage). Hints of seismic reflections as shallow~10 m are present in the images of Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation