First results of zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb dating of the rocks from the Granulite complex of Khanka massif in the Primorye region

Ханчук, А. И.; Vovna, G. M.; Kiselev, V. F.; Mishkin, M. A.; Lavrik, S. N.

doi:10.1134/s1028334x10090059

Cited by 52 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These Neoproterozoic detrital zircons have varying roundness, indicating they were derived from both nearby and relatively distant origins, which is consistent with the occurrence of Neoproterozoic granitic intrusive rocks in the Songliao Massif (917-911 Ma and ~841 Ma; Luan et al, 2017. In addition, Neoproterozoic magmatic events have also been reported in the Erguna, Jiamusi and Khanka massifs in the eastern part of the CAOB (Khanchuk et al, 2010;Wu et al, 2011;Tang et al, 2013;Yang et al, 2018;Zhou J B et al, 2018). In summary, Neoproterozoic magmatism existed widely in all massifs of the eastern CAOB, which corresponds to the assembly and breakup of the Rodinia supercontinent, indicating that the massifs in the eastern CAOB might be derived from the Rodinia supercontinent (Cawood et al, 2016;Zhou J B et al, 2018;Luan et al, 2019).…”

Section: Provenance Of the Xilin Groupsupporting

confidence: 70%

Detrital Zircon U‐Pb Geochronology of the Xilin Group: Constraints for the Early Paleozoic Tectonic Evolution of the Songliao Massif

Sang

Pei

et al. 2021

Acta Geologica Sinica (Eng)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Xilin Group, composed of the Chenming, Laodaomiaogou, Qianshan and Wuxingzhen formations, is one of the Early Paleozoic terranes in the eastern Songliao Massif, mainly consisting of thick layers of fine clastic and carbonate rocks. This study presents LA‐ICP‐MS zircon U‐Pb geochronological data for the Laodaomiaogou and Qianshan formations, further constraining their provenance and the Early Paleozoic tectonic evolution of the Songliao Massif on the eastern Central Asian Orogenic Belt. Most zircons from the Laodaomiaogou and Qianshan formations show magmatic oscillatory zoning and high Th/U ratios (0.26–2.41). Zircon U‐Pb dating results indicate that the detrital zircons from the silty mudstone of the Laodaomiaogou Formation yield peak ages of 634 Ma, 775 Ma, 820 Ma, 880 Ma and 927 Ma, as well as multi‐episodic Archean to Paleoproterozoic and Mesoproterozoic ages (1405–643 Ma), implying its deposition time is younger than ∼634 Ma. Furthermore, the occurrence of Early Cambrian fossils indicates that the Laodaomiaogou Formation was deposited during the late stage of the Early Cambrian (∼514 Ma). The zircons from the K‐bentonite of the Qianshan Formation show four peak ages of 444 Ma, 471 Ma, 489 Ma and 518 Ma and the youngest age peak of 444 ± 4 Ma (n = 6) indicates that the Qianshan Formation was deposited during the Late Ordovician. In addition, the peak ages of the detrital zircons in the silty mudstone of the Qianshan Formation are 472 Ma and 498 Ma, as well as two other concordant points with 207Pb/206Pb apparent ages of 1824 Ma and 1985 Ma. The dating results in this study, together with published data, indicate the absence of Pan‐African magmatic events in the Songliao Massif prior to the initial deposition of the Xilin Group, in contrast to those distributed widely in the Jiamusi Massif. Taken together, we conclude that the depositional provenance of the Laodaomiaogou and Qianshan formations was derived from the Songliao Massif. Furthermore, the characteristics of the detrital zircon age composition and rock associations indicate that the Laodaomiaogou Formation formed in a passive continental margin environment, in contrast to the Qianshan Formation, which formed in an active continental margin environment. The above results also imply that the Songliao and Jiamusi massifs might not have collided before the Late Ordovician.

show abstract

Section: Provenance Of the Xilin Groupsupporting

confidence: 70%

Detrital Zircon U‐Pb Geochronology of the Xilin Group: Constraints for the Early Paleozoic Tectonic Evolution of the Songliao Massif

Sang

Pei

et al. 2021

Acta Geologica Sinica (Eng)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the Russian segment of the Khanka massif, limited U–Pb dating of zircons from the Grodekovo batholith from the Voznesensk terrane in southwestern Primorye revealed younger ages of 247–268 and ~450 Ma (Khanchuk et al ., ). However, zircons from the Iman Group granulite complex in the Primorye region yield 757 Ma for the crystallization age of the magmatic protoliths and 507 Ma for the age of metamorphism (Khanchuk et al ., ). Nd model ages obtained for metapelites of the Matveevka suite of the Khanka massif are between 1.9 and 1.8 Ga (Kruk et al ., ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 97%

Ancient mantle lithosphere beneath the Khanka massif in the Russian Far East: in situ Re–Os evidence

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Os-isotope compositions of sulphides in mantle xenoliths hosted by Late Miocene alkali basalts from the Sviyaginsky volcano, Russian Far East, reveal the presence of Archaean-Proterozoic subcontinental lithospheric mantle beneath the Khanka massif. Their T MA and T RD model ages reveal similar peaks at 1.1 and 0.8 Ga suggesting later thermotectonic events in the subcontinental lithospheric mantle, whereas T RD model ages range back to 2.8 AE 0.5 (2r) Ga. The events recognized in the subcontinental lithospheric mantle are consistent with those recorded in the crust of the Khanka massif.The sulphide Os-isotope data show that the subcontinental lithospheric mantle beneath the Khanka massif had formed at least by the Mesoproterozoic, and was subsequently metasomatized by juvenile crustal-growth events related to the evolution of the Altaids. The Khanka massif is further proposed to have tectonic affinity to the Siberia Craton and should originate from it accordingly.

show abstract

“…Magmatic detrital zircons of this age also show peaks in the Early‐Middle Permian strata of the Khanka Massif, such as the 479 Ma age peak in the Early Permian Dasuangou Formation and the 493 Ma age peak in the Middle Permian Jiefangcun Formation in Yanbian (Chen et al, 2014; Wei et al, 2020). However, the Khanka Massif lacks contemporaneous magmatic activity (Khanchuk, Sakhno, & Alenicheva, 2010; Khanchuk, Vovna, et al, 2010; Xu et al, 2018). On the contrary, igneous rocks of 490–470 Ma are widely distributed in the Jiamusi Massif, such as the diagenetic age of 492 ± 6 Ma granite gneiss and 488 ± 2 Ma granite in the northern Luobei area (Han et al, 2020; Li, Zhou, & Li, 2020), 488 ± 3 Ma granite in the eastern Baoshihe area (Bi, 2015), and 492 ± 6 Ma granite gneiss in the Western Yilan area, 499–476 Ma I‐type granite in Mishan‐Jidong area in the South (Yang, 2017), 490–476 Ma gneissic granite in Boli area in the South‐west (Yang, 2017; Yang et al, 2018), 486 ± 3 Ma granite in Muling area (Xie, Miao, et al, 2008) (Figure 10).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Early Permian assembly of the Jiamusi Massif and Khanka Massif: Evidence from sediment sources

Ningchen

Zhou

et al. 2022

Geological Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Jiamusi-Khanka Massif is an important tectonic unit of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt in North-east China. Its Late Palaeozoic tectonic properties and the timing of assembly have restricted the understanding of the tectonic evolution process at the eastern segment of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt for a long time. Based on the study of clastic rock petrology and zircon U-Pb chronology of the Early Permian Erlongshan Formation in Mishan, it is clear that the zircon age of the Early Permian Erlongshan Formation in Mishan is mainly Late Palaeozoic, with a major age peak at 300 ± 3 Ma and secondary age peaks at 356 ± 7 Ma and 475 ± 10 Ma.The provenance mainly comes from the magmatic arc source area, and Early Palaeozoic (500-420 Ma) detrital zircons mainly come from the south-east margin of Jiamusi Massif, Late Palaeozoic (400-270 Ma) detrital zircons mainly come from the eastern margin of Jiamusi Massif and the northern margin of Khanka Massif.Among them, detrital zircons of a special age group 330-310 Ma come from the north of Khanka Massif, while 490-470 Ma detrital zircons which are common in the Early-Middle Permian strata of Khanka Massif come from Jiamusi Massif. Combined with the evidence of petrology and palaeontology, this paper believes that the Early Permian Jiamusi Massif and Khanka Massif should be a unified Massif, that is, Jiamusi-Khanka Massif.

show abstract

First results of zircon LA-ICP-MS U-Pb dating of the rocks from the Granulite complex of Khanka massif in the Primorye region

Cited by 52 publications

References 4 publications

Detrital Zircon U‐Pb Geochronology of the Xilin Group: Constraints for the Early Paleozoic Tectonic Evolution of the Songliao Massif

Detrital Zircon U‐Pb Geochronology of the Xilin Group: Constraints for the Early Paleozoic Tectonic Evolution of the Songliao Massif

Ancient mantle lithosphere beneath the Khanka massif in the Russian Far East: in situ Re–Os evidence

The Early Permian assembly of the Jiamusi Massif and Khanka Massif: Evidence from sediment sources

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About