1992
DOI: 10.1093/rpd/45.1-4.459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First Results of the Indoor Natural Radiation Survey in Italy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The arithmetic mean was found to be 327 ± 102 nGy h −1 , while the lowest value measured was 136 nGy h −1 and the highest 702 nGy h −1 . The mean value of the indoor gamma dose rate obtained is higher than the national average, which is 105 ± 10 nGy h −1 (Bochicchio et al, 1996a). This result could be due to the presence of active volcanoes in the coastal area of the Province of Naples, with the consequence of an elevated presence of undifferentiated pyroclastic rocks (Ortolani and Pagliuca, 1987), widely used in building construction.…”
Section: Indoor Gamma Dose Ratementioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The arithmetic mean was found to be 327 ± 102 nGy h −1 , while the lowest value measured was 136 nGy h −1 and the highest 702 nGy h −1 . The mean value of the indoor gamma dose rate obtained is higher than the national average, which is 105 ± 10 nGy h −1 (Bochicchio et al, 1996a). This result could be due to the presence of active volcanoes in the coastal area of the Province of Naples, with the consequence of an elevated presence of undifferentiated pyroclastic rocks (Ortolani and Pagliuca, 1987), widely used in building construction.…”
Section: Indoor Gamma Dose Ratementioning
confidence: 85%
“…The estimated annual effective dose by the gamma dose rate in air was found to be 1.6 mSv y −1 , which is higher than the Italian national average (0.4) mSv y −1 (Bochicchio et al, 1996a). Moreover, taking into account the UNSCEAR model, the annual effective dose to the general population due to radon was calculated using the following formula:…”
Section: Radiological Effect Estimates Of the Indoor Gamma Dose Rate ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 984 and 329 schools respectively had radon concentrations greater than 200 and 400 Bq m −3 in one or more locations (figure 4). Results from a number of radon surveys in schools that have been carried out in Europe and the US have been published (Bochicchio et al 1992, Poffijn et al 1992, Phillips et al 1992, Vaupotic et al 1994, Durcik et al 1997. Generally these surveys are not as comprehensive as the Irish survey, with only a limited number of schools surveyed, and not all occupied rooms were tested.…”
Section: Radon Concentrations In Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%