2020
DOI: 10.5197/j.2044-0588.2020.041.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First report of Pantoea ananatis causing fruitlet blight of Nagpur mandarin (Citrus reticulata) in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our obtained results are in agreement with those recorded by Gonzȃlez et al (2015). They found that Pantoea was the causal agent of leaf bight in many plants for example, on leaves of Nagpur mandarin, The symptom of P. ananatis infection were irregular watersoaked with P. ananatis infection the leaves became water-soaked and quickly turned dark brown or black (Das et al 2020). In wheat there were brownish lesions with clear margins and yellow leaves (Krawczyk et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our obtained results are in agreement with those recorded by Gonzȃlez et al (2015). They found that Pantoea was the causal agent of leaf bight in many plants for example, on leaves of Nagpur mandarin, The symptom of P. ananatis infection were irregular watersoaked with P. ananatis infection the leaves became water-soaked and quickly turned dark brown or black (Das et al 2020). In wheat there were brownish lesions with clear margins and yellow leaves (Krawczyk et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…They reported that P. ananatis is Gram-negative, non-spore-forming, facultative anaerobic, motile, produce catalase, indole production and acid production from D-glucose, D-mannitol, sucrose and lactose. Furthermore, P. ana natis grew on nutrient agar medium and produced bacterial colonies which were yellow, shiny, translucent, convex and circular with entire margins (Das et al 2020). The identification of P. ananatis was confirmed by PCR analysis using 16S rRNA (Yumoto et al 2001;Suryani et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the last 100 years, disease outbreaks were reported, in which P. ananatis was recognised as the causal agent, or as an associated bacterium that increased disease severity, in association with other pathogens (Paccola‐Meirelles et al, 2001 ; Xue et al, 2021 ). A few cases are associated with a pre‐ or post‐harvest decay of fruits or bulbs, but lacking any specific symptoms on other plant parts (Serrano, 1928 ; Ceponis et al, 1985 ; Bruton et al, 1991 ; Liao et al, 2016 ; Das et al, 2020 ). Currently, the main hosts of P. ananatis reported in the most recent literature are: onion ( Allium cepa ), rice ( Oryza sativa ), maize ( Zea mays ), sorghum ( Sorghum spp.…”
Section: Pest Categorisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On sorghum, occasional disease outbreaks lead to foliar blights up to 50% of leaves (Azad et al, 2000 ). More recently, up to 20% of fruitlet losses were reported on mandarin in Maharashtra, India (Das et al, 2020 ). As a post‐harvest pathogen of melon, P. ananatis was reported to cause up to 87% of losses during storage of fruits (Bruton et al, 1991 ).…”
Section: Pest Categorisationmentioning
confidence: 99%