2019
DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First pass effect with contact aspiration and stent retrievers in the Aspiration versus Stent Retriever (ASTER) trial

Abstract: BackgroundThe ‘first pass effect’ (FPE), which was originally described with stent retrievers, designates a (near-)complete revascularization obtained after a single device pass with no rescue therapy, and is associated with improved clinical outcome and decreased mortality.ObjectiveWe report the rate and benefits of FPE in the Aspiration versus Stent Retriever (ASTER) trial.Materials and methodsASTER is a randomized trial comparing angiographic revascularization with the stent retriever (SR) and contact aspir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

7
66
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
7
66
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…26 Additionally, the association between FPE and favorable clinical outcome (mRS score at 90 days of 0-2 or equal to pre-stroke mRS score) has been shown to be independent of the technique used (stent retriever vs aspiration, p=0.29). 27 This analysis demonstrated that achieving mTICI 2c-3 after the first pass was associated with reduced healthcare resource use. Patients in the FPE group required fewer thrombectomy devices; the number of devices used to achieve mTICI 2c-3 is inevitably linked to the number of passes even though up to three attempts with the same device were allowed in the EmboTrap instructions for use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…26 Additionally, the association between FPE and favorable clinical outcome (mRS score at 90 days of 0-2 or equal to pre-stroke mRS score) has been shown to be independent of the technique used (stent retriever vs aspiration, p=0.29). 27 This analysis demonstrated that achieving mTICI 2c-3 after the first pass was associated with reduced healthcare resource use. Patients in the FPE group required fewer thrombectomy devices; the number of devices used to achieve mTICI 2c-3 is inevitably linked to the number of passes even though up to three attempts with the same device were allowed in the EmboTrap instructions for use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The definition of a successful procedure in stroke endovascular therapy is continuously shifting toward more complete and faster recanalization [6,[26][27][28] and eTICI 3 at FP represents the ultimate goal. The rate of successful recanalization at FP is present in~28% of patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy [6,29]. This low rate underlines the need to develop strategy and devices that can successfully retrieve thrombi in fewer passes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the previous neurointerventional literature, a recanalization grade greater than or equal to TICI 2b was determined as an acceptable outcome. 2 We were able to achieve TICI grade 2b or higher recanalization in 86.8% of patients. Recently, however, a call for a higher outcome standard has been made as more up-to-date literature suggests that patients with TICI grade 2b recanalization have inferior outcomes when compared to patients who achieve TICI…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…17 First-pass recanalization only occurs in approximately 1 in 4 patients who undergo mechanical thrombectomy, and additional retrieval attempts in the remaining 75% of patients are associated with procedural complications and worse clinical outcomes. 2 Anatomical predictors of a first-pass effect are lacking in the neurointerventional literature but could be crucial in guid-ing the development of improved retrieval devices and techniques that are individualized to each patient's unique anatomy. Upstream vessel morphology and anatomical parameters have previously been demonstrated to be associated with downstream hemodynamic consequences, but such relationships have not been explored in the context of stroke intervention for large-vessel occlusion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%