2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.02.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First-order-reversal-curve analysis of exchange-coupled SmCo/NdFeB nanocomposite alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Switching of the magnetic field to the values lying out of hysteresis loops did not stimulate magnetic relaxation in CoFeB bilayer, while same procedure causes relaxation in Pt/ Co bilayers. The values of relaxation parameters obtained by above described method can be compared with parameters extracted from first order reversal curve (FORC) map [26][27][28][29][30]. Although the data of FORC technique is obtained in sweeping magnetic field [31], while M(t) dependences were recorded in stationary magnetic field we will compare results below.…”
Section: Domain Nucleation Versus Dw Propagation In Single and Double...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Switching of the magnetic field to the values lying out of hysteresis loops did not stimulate magnetic relaxation in CoFeB bilayer, while same procedure causes relaxation in Pt/ Co bilayers. The values of relaxation parameters obtained by above described method can be compared with parameters extracted from first order reversal curve (FORC) map [26][27][28][29][30]. Although the data of FORC technique is obtained in sweeping magnetic field [31], while M(t) dependences were recorded in stationary magnetic field we will compare results below.…”
Section: Domain Nucleation Versus Dw Propagation In Single and Double...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above-described sequences were repeated in the 240-350 K temperature range. The values of relaxation depths and times obtained by this method can also be found from the first order reversal curve (FORC) diagrams [13][14][15]. However, in the FORC technique time dependence of magnetization is recorded while sweeping the magnetic field.…”
Section: B Competition Between Domain Nucleation and Domain-wall Promentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 can be explained by the difference of the magnetic anisotropy in the above-discussed layers. The experimental technique described above can be considered as the development of the famous modern method of studying magnetic relaxation (FORC) [13][14][15]. Multiple measurements of magnetic relaxation in different conditions (field and temperature) can provide a 2D map of relaxation parameters in the case of the unified approach for their extraction.…”
Section: B Competition Between Domain Nucleation and Domain-wall Promentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of FORC diagrams became a frequently used tool to study different kind of magnetic systems [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. As this method provides more information than conventional hysteresis cycles from the same type of experiment, its use has been increased considerably in recent years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%