2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2015.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First molecular survey and novel genetic variants’ identification of Anaplasma marginale, A. centrale and A. bovis in cattle from Tunisia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

7
71
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
7
71
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the case also in Turkey (2.3%) (Aktas et al., ), Brazil (5.4%) (Silva et al., ), Pakistan (17%) (Ashraf et al., ) and Mongolia (8.7%) (Ybañez et al., ). The difference in infection rates of A. marginale may be due to differences in tick control programmes, habitat suitability for ticks, farm management, husbandry practices, wildlife reservoir hosts and/or abiotic factors as reported by others (Belkahia et al., ; Torina et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is the case also in Turkey (2.3%) (Aktas et al., ), Brazil (5.4%) (Silva et al., ), Pakistan (17%) (Ashraf et al., ) and Mongolia (8.7%) (Ybañez et al., ). The difference in infection rates of A. marginale may be due to differences in tick control programmes, habitat suitability for ticks, farm management, husbandry practices, wildlife reservoir hosts and/or abiotic factors as reported by others (Belkahia et al., ; Torina et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The overall infection rate with A. marginale described in our study was 11.1%. Several studies detecting A. marginale infection in cattle have been carried out in some regions from Africa with different rates such as in Tunisia (25.4%) (Belkahia et al., ); Morocco (21.9%) (Ait Hamou et al., ); Sudan (6.1%) (Awad et al., ); Egypt (3.7%) (Younis, Hegazy, El‐Deeb, & El‐Khatib, ); Madagascar (89.7%) (Pothmann et al., ); Nigeria (75.9%) (Elelu, Ferrolho, Couto, Domingos, & Eisler, ); Kenya (32.5%) (Adjou Moumouni et al., ); Angola (38%) (Kubelová, Mazancová, & Siroky, ); and Mozambique (67%) (Machado et al., ). This is the case also in Turkey (2.3%) (Aktas et al., ), Brazil (5.4%) (Silva et al., ), Pakistan (17%) (Ashraf et al., ) and Mongolia (8.7%) (Ybañez et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The frequency of infected cattle depends geographically on the region. Thus, in the states of North Africa, for example, in Morocco and Tunisia, it is 25.4 and 29.1 % [15,16], respectively, while in Central and South Africa this index ranges from 38 to 100 % [17,18]. In the Russian Federation, according to veterinary reports, anaplasmosis is mostly recorded in the southern regions, Bryansk, Kaluga, Ryazan, Kaliningrad, Saratov, Tyumensk, Vladimir, Nizhny Novgorod, Novosibirsk and Ulyanovsk regions, Altai territory [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%