2017
DOI: 10.7883/yoken.jjid.2017.179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First Isolation of Human Parechovirus Type 4 in Yamagata, Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We isolated PeVA1, PeVA3 and PeVA6 strains using a routine microplate method including six cell lines as well as the LLC-MK2-N cell line, which is sensitive to PeVA viruses, in combination with molecular screening for the PeVA genome, and performed a seroepidemiological study using these representative Yamagata PeVA1, PeVA3 and PeVA6 isolates in 2014 [15,17,23]. In 2016, we succeeded in isolating the first PeVA4 strain in Yamagata [24]. Thus, we applied this PeVA4 strain to a seroepidemiological study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We isolated PeVA1, PeVA3 and PeVA6 strains using a routine microplate method including six cell lines as well as the LLC-MK2-N cell line, which is sensitive to PeVA viruses, in combination with molecular screening for the PeVA genome, and performed a seroepidemiological study using these representative Yamagata PeVA1, PeVA3 and PeVA6 isolates in 2014 [15,17,23]. In 2016, we succeeded in isolating the first PeVA4 strain in Yamagata [24]. Thus, we applied this PeVA4 strain to a seroepidemiological study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another microplate including the LLC‐MK2‐N cell line was further added independently for the isolation of parainfluenza viruses and parechoviruses 17,23 . In 2016, direct molecular screening of the PeV genome from the clinical specimens by a real‐time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method, which was modified based on the method reported by Nix et al, was also introduced 24,25 . Since then, PeV genome‐positive specimens were inoculated into LLC‐MK2‐N cell lines, and three to five passages were performed as a two‐step virus isolation method to isolate PeV, particularly PeVA3, more efficiently 17 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,23 In 2016, direct molecular screening of the PeV genome from the clinical specimens by a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method, which was modified based on the method reported by Nix et al, was also introduced. 24,25 Since then, PeV genome-positive specimens were inoculated into LLC-MK2-N cell lines, and three to five passages were performed as a two-step virus isolation method to isolate PeV, particularly PeVA3, more efficiently. 17 The clinical characteristics of children who tested positive for PeVA1 and for whom informed consent was obtained (from their guardian) for The National Epidemiological Surveillance of Infectious Diseases, Japan, were obtained from their medical records.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2A); First, we screen the virus genome directly from the nasopharyngeal specimens using genome amplification methods such as RT-PCR and real-time RT-PCR, and then, we inoculate only the genome-positive specimens onto the appropriate cell lines and perform 3-5 passages. For example, after screening, we inoculate the genomepositive specimens onto the LLC-MK2-Niigata (LLC-MK2-N) cell line for the isolation of parechoviruses (PeVs) (23,24), the RD-18S-Niigata (RD-18S-N) cell line for the isolation of Saffold viruses (SAFVs) (25,26), the RD-A cell line for the isolation of EV-D68 and CV-A6, and the HeLa-ACE2-TMPRSS2 cell line for the isolation of human coronavirus 229E (HCoV-229E) ( Table 2) (27). The LLC-MK2-N and RD-18S-N cell lines have better sensitivities for PeVs and SAFVs, respectively, than the LLC-MK2 and RD-18S cell lines that we have used in our laboratory.…”
Section: -3 Two-step Virus Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%