2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11046-011-9447-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First Isolation of Candida dubliniensis from Oral Cavities of Dermatological Patients in Nanjing, China

Abstract: Candida dubliniensis is an emerging pathogen capable of causing both superficial and systemic infections. Although C. dubliniensis and C. albicans are phenotypically similar, the two species differ in terms of epidemiology and the ability to rapidly develop resistance to fluconazole. C. dubliniensis is primarily associated with oral candidiasis of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected individuals. In this study, we describe the first recovery of C. dubliniensis from oral cavities of non-HIV-infected pati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the colonized denture wearers in our study, C. albicans was the major isolated species, followed by C. famata and C. tropicalis , which were the most frequent non- C. albicans species. These results corroborated the findings of other studies, 11 , 14 , 21 , 25 , 26 , 27 including other Brazilian studies. 16 , 28 , 29 , 30 Additionally, Sant’Ana et al 31 reported that the presence of two or more species in the same patient can predispose the patient to recurrent stomatitis, and double isolations were also observed in denture wearers with DRS in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Among the colonized denture wearers in our study, C. albicans was the major isolated species, followed by C. famata and C. tropicalis , which were the most frequent non- C. albicans species. These results corroborated the findings of other studies, 11 , 14 , 21 , 25 , 26 , 27 including other Brazilian studies. 16 , 28 , 29 , 30 Additionally, Sant’Ana et al 31 reported that the presence of two or more species in the same patient can predispose the patient to recurrent stomatitis, and double isolations were also observed in denture wearers with DRS in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For instance, Trevino-Rangel et al [19] reported that 17 % (5/30), 7 % (2/30), and 60 % (3/5) of C. parapsilosis sensu stricto, C. orthopsilosis, and C. metapsilosis isolates, respectively, were significant producers of protease. On the other hand, a number of studies identified a high proportion of proteaseproducing C. parapsilosis sensu stricto isolates, ranging from 66.1 to 100 % [32,[38][39][40]. Similarly, recent reports found also a high proportion of isolates of both C. metapsilosis and C. orthopsilosis exhibiting protease activity [19,32,38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, a number of studies identified a high proportion of proteaseproducing C. parapsilosis sensu stricto isolates, ranging from 66.1 to 100 % [32,[38][39][40]. Similarly, recent reports found also a high proportion of isolates of both C. metapsilosis and C. orthopsilosis exhibiting protease activity [19,32,38]. According to Ge et al [32], the reasons for this variability among studies are unknown, but it may be due to the media used for enzymatic tests, as sensitivity of different media varies; another potential reason might be related to the different incubation temperatures used in the assays (30 or 37°C).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding is corroborated by studies of C. dubliniensis isolated from the oral cavity 15 and from denture users presenting with stomatitis 5,6 . Although the pathogenesis of oral infection due to C. dubliniensis is poorly understood, germ tube formation is the primary virulence factor that triggers yeast proliferation during the infection process 7,18 . Depending on the isolate, different percentages of cells forming germ tubes were observed (Figure 1, p = 0.06), variation that might be related to variability in the adaptation of each isolate to the incubation conditions in the test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%