2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.06.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First Experience With the Coronary Sinus Reducer System for the Management of Refractory Angina in Patients Without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CS reducer device was also shown to provide benefit in patients with refractory angina despite complete revascularization of the epicardial coronary arteries . Specifically, data from eight patients showed a significant reduction in CCS score, improvement in most of the domains of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (physical limitation, angina stability, angina frequency, treatment satisfaction, and quality of life) and in 6‐min‐walk test .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The CS reducer device was also shown to provide benefit in patients with refractory angina despite complete revascularization of the epicardial coronary arteries . Specifically, data from eight patients showed a significant reduction in CCS score, improvement in most of the domains of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (physical limitation, angina stability, angina frequency, treatment satisfaction, and quality of life) and in 6‐min‐walk test .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A total of six studies involving 196 patients (mean age: 67.9 years, 81% men) were included in the systematic review (Figure ). NOS analysis showed that none of the included studies was classified as a poor‐quality study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As consequence of the maneuver, a distal deformation ("partial Although, evidence on CS Reducer safety is limited to some observational studies [3][4][5][6] and to the COSIRA trial 2 , initial experience shows rare periprocedural or device-related complications. Since the first CS Reducer implantation on 2004, only a case of CS perforation has been reported so far.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consequent increase of CS and backward pressures of the coronary tree should promote a redistribution of the blood flow toward more ischemic myocardial territories, thus improving ischemia and symptoms. A single randomized, sham‐controlled trial and few observational studies have demonstrated its safety and efficacy. The initial promising results, with associated reduction of both angina symptoms and myocardial ischemia burden might lead to increased future Reducer implantations; therefore, experience on how to manage potential complications that might arise would be of clinical significance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%