2001
DOI: 10.3201/eid0705.010520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First Epidemic of Echovirus 16 Meningitis in Cuba

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This assay is highly sensitive (0.01 tissue culture infective dose, TCID 50 ) and has been adopted as a routine method for the diagnosis of enterovirus infections at the enterovirus laboratory in Cuba [23]. It detects RNA of all known enteroviruses as the amplified sequence is conserved among them [21,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This assay is highly sensitive (0.01 tissue culture infective dose, TCID 50 ) and has been adopted as a routine method for the diagnosis of enterovirus infections at the enterovirus laboratory in Cuba [23]. It detects RNA of all known enteroviruses as the amplified sequence is conserved among them [21,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The external primers (EV/PCR1, 5 0 -ATTGTCACCATAAGCA-GCCA-3 0 ; EV/PCR2, 5 0 -TCCTCCGGCCCCCTGA-ATGCG-3 0 ) generate a 154 base pair (bp) fragment, whereas the internal primers (EV/PVR3, 5 0 -ACACG-GACACCCAAAGTAGTCGGTTCC-3 0 ; EV/PCR4, 5 0 -TCCGGCCCCTGAATGCGGCTAATCC-3 0 ) generate a 114 bp PCR product [21,22]. Amplification reactions were carried by out using a highly sensitive nested RT-PCR method [23]. In brief, first-round RT-PCR was performed in 50 ml reaction mixture containing 5 ml of RNA extracted in PCR buffer (67 mM Tris -HCl; pH 8.…”
Section: In Vitro Amplificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presence/absence analyses for the following human enteric viruses were carried out on a subset of samples using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-based methods and previously published assays and conditions (Table 1; (37)(38)(39)(40): enterovirus (EV; n = 117), hepatitis A virus (HAV; n = 117), norovirus GI (NoVGI; n = 72) and GII (NoVGII; n = 72), and rotavirus group A (RV; n = 79). Presence-absence human enteric virus data were generated in this study because previous studies demonstrated a better correlation between enteric virus presence/absence and coliphages in comparison with correlations with quantitative enteric virus data (27,41).…”
Section: Downloaded Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where c equals copies that could be detected per RT-qPCR reaction (i.e., lowest copy number detected divided by 2 (difference between double-stranded standard curve material and singlestranded viral RNA)); v 1 equals the volume of cDNA added to the qPCR reaction (5 µl); V 1 equals the total volume of cDNA synthesized (20 µl); E 1 equals the worst-case RT efficiency previously reported (19%; (42)); v 2 equals the volume of RNA in the RT reaction (8 µl); V 2 equals the total volume of RNA purified (50 µl); E 2 equals the worst-case viral RNA purification efficiency (90%; (43)); v 3 equals the volume of PEG concentrate that RNA was purified from (500 µl); V 3 equals the total volume of PEG concentrate (500 µl); v 4 equals the eluate volume that was PEG concentrated (45 mL); V 4 equals the total volume of eluate (45 mL); V 5 equals the total volume of wastewater (1000 mL); and E 3 equals the estimated virus concentration efficiency (40%; (35)). The limit of detection for the assays could have been as few as 10 copies (J. Nordgren, personal communication) and great as 1,000 copies (37,38). Since the limit of detection of each assay was not tested in this study, the limit of detection (c) was defined as 10 copies and 1,000 copies.…”
Section: Downloaded Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Virological studies were carried out using conventional methods for diagnosis of enterovirus and a reverse transcriptase-nested polymerase chain reaction assay of CSF specimens [Sarmiento et al, 2001;Sarmiento, 2004].…”
Section: Epidemic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%