2017
DOI: 10.1109/jeds.2017.2737778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First Demonstration of a Two-Tier Pixelated Avalanche Sensor for Charged Particle Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in the figures, remarkably different values of breakdown voltage were found among the DUTs, from 16.6 to 18.4 V, although much smaller variations were detected among different arrays in the same chip. In the different distributions, the standard deviation, ranging from 10 to 30 mV, is comparable with that already measured in SPADs with similar structure and fabricated with the same technology as the devices tested in this work [10]. Monte Carlo simulations indicate that the switching threshold of the N1 inverter is distributed around the nominal 1 V value with a standard deviation below 4 mV, therefore negligibly affecting the breakdown voltage measurements.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in the figures, remarkably different values of breakdown voltage were found among the DUTs, from 16.6 to 18.4 V, although much smaller variations were detected among different arrays in the same chip. In the different distributions, the standard deviation, ranging from 10 to 30 mV, is comparable with that already measured in SPADs with similar structure and fabricated with the same technology as the devices tested in this work [10]. Monte Carlo simulations indicate that the switching threshold of the N1 inverter is distributed around the nominal 1 V value with a standard deviation below 4 mV, therefore negligibly affecting the breakdown voltage measurements.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Vertical integration of two SPAD layers has been proposed as a DCR mitigation strategy [9]. More recently, in the frame of the APiX2/ ASAP collaboration, funded by the Italian Institute for Nuclear Physics (INFN), the first prototype of a two-tier SPAD detector, providing a coincidence signal when a particle simultaneously strikes two overlapping sensors and significantly reducing the DCR, was successfully tested [10]. While radiation resistance in SPADs is in general poor, with non negligible increase in DCR already at 1 MeV neutron equivalent fluences in the order of 10 9 cm −2 in devices with a 200 μm 3 active volume [11], the coincidence signal approach is expected to mitigate the effect of the radiation susceptibility of the individual layer on the radiation tolerance performance of the bi-layered system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this technology, it is possible to develop new digital avalanche pixel structures, which provide a direct access to each pixel. The avalanche pixel image sensors and the avalanche pixel tracking sensors use this technology for low photon flux and ionizing radiation, respectively [ 16 , 17 ]. The application of CMOS SPAD sensor solutions to digital SiPM was demonstrated among others in the 800 nm [ 10 ] and 350 nm [ 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The INFN in collaboration with multiple universities developed a BSI 3D PDC for charged particle detection in the APiX2 experiment (note that it is not designed for visible light measurement). Compared to the other 3D PDCs presented in this section, the particularity of this detector is the use of SPADs on both the top and bottom layer of the 3D stack ( Figure 6 ) [ 89 , 90 ]. Each pixel of the detector is composed of two vertically aligned SPAD to exploit the coincidence between them to discriminate between a dark count and the detection of charged particles.…”
Section: Review Of 3d Pdcmentioning
confidence: 99%