2015
DOI: 10.1177/0022146515609903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

First-birth Timing, Marital History, and Women’s Health at Midlife

Abstract: Despite evidence that first-birth timing influences women’s health, the role of marital status in shaping this association has received scant attention. Using multivariate propensity score matching, we analyze data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 to estimate the effect of having a first birth in adolescence (prior to age 20), young adulthood (ages 20–24), or later ages (ages 25–35) on women’s midlife self-assessed health. Findings suggest that adolescent childbearing is associated with wors… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
33
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(100 reference statements)
1
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Their timing has implications for mothers’ and children’s achievement, health, and well-being (Royer, 2004; Loughran and Zissimopoulos, 2009; Augustine, Pricket, Kendig, and Crosnoe, 2015; Williams, Sassler, Addo, & Frech, 2015), and their timing affects population growth and decline. This study provides evidence that religious exposure during childhood and adolescence is related to the timing of subsequent births--nonmarital and marital.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Their timing has implications for mothers’ and children’s achievement, health, and well-being (Royer, 2004; Loughran and Zissimopoulos, 2009; Augustine, Pricket, Kendig, and Crosnoe, 2015; Williams, Sassler, Addo, & Frech, 2015), and their timing affects population growth and decline. This study provides evidence that religious exposure during childhood and adolescence is related to the timing of subsequent births--nonmarital and marital.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The timing of first birth has been relatively neglected, although it carries significant consequences for women’s socioeconomic attainment and long-term health and well-being, along with the health and well-being of their children (Royer, 2004; Loughran and Zissimopoulos, 2009; Augustine, Pricket, Kendig, and Crosnoe, 2015; Williams, Sassler, Addo, & Frech, 2015). As women who have earlier first births are likely to have more births overall (Rindfuss, Morgan, and Swicegood, 1988; Mills, Rindfuss, McDonald and te Velde, 2011), studying the relationships between religion and the timing of first birth may additionally help us anticipate how macro-level religious change might affect population growth or decline.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Williams et al (2015) use a propensity score matching design with the 1979 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY) to examine effects of birth timing (coded 15-19, 20-24, and 25-35) on women's self-rated health at age 40. Their analyses indicate that a first birth that occurs in the 20-24 age range is linked to poorer selfrated health for both black and white women, and an AFB of 15-19 is also linked to poorer health for black but not white women (compared to 25-35).…”
Section: Empirical Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They find however, that a birth in the 20-24 age range is not linked to better health outcomes when compared with a birth from 15-19. The propensity score matching (PSM) design used by Williams et al (2015) has several advantages compared to the common strategy of regression adjustment, most notably ensuring that the 'treated' and 'control' groups used in the final comparisons overlap, and thereby reducing model dependence in their analyses (Ho et al 2007). However, in common with all propensity score approaches, Williams et al's (2015) analyses can only adjust for observed confounders.…”
Section: Empirical Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation