2013
DOI: 10.1002/sej.1164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Firm-Specific Determinants of Product Line Technology Strategies in High Technology Markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent work illuminates how firms alter their portfolios based on industry conditions (Putsis and Bayus, ) or firm capabilities (De Figueiredo and Kyle, ). Often, firms deliberately aim to structure their portfolios to capitalize on distinctive strengths (Sarangee and Echambadi, ; Shankar, ).…”
Section: Entry Timing Through a Portfolio Lensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work illuminates how firms alter their portfolios based on industry conditions (Putsis and Bayus, ) or firm capabilities (De Figueiredo and Kyle, ). Often, firms deliberately aim to structure their portfolios to capitalize on distinctive strengths (Sarangee and Echambadi, ; Shankar, ).…”
Section: Entry Timing Through a Portfolio Lensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Han et al assert, the ability to successfully innovate in the marketplace thereby affects firm performance (Clarysse et al, 2011;Lin et al, 2006;Paik, 2013;Sarangee and Echambadi, 2013) and differences in firms' marketing capabilities can lead to different performance outcomes. We, therefore, hypothesize: H 9 .…”
Section: Perception Of Availability Of Resources and Economic Sanctiomentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The industry evolution literature itself had evolved due to blossoming scholarly attention over two decades, establishing a key stylized fact regarding the development of submarkets that built off technological discontinuities (Christensen, ; King and Tucci, ; Mitchell, , ). These technological discontinuities triggered renewed entry (Mitchell, ; King and Tucci, ; Sarangee and Echambadi, forthcoming) and multiple opportunities for firms to pioneer new segments by building off capabilities developed in earlier markets (Franco et al ., ). The ensuing incumbent‐entrant dynamics led to more complicated industry evolution patterns than shakeouts followed by an oligopolistic market structure, which Gort and Klepper () did not document and Klepper () could not fully explain.…”
Section: Employee Entrepreneurshipmentioning
confidence: 99%