2017
DOI: 10.15185/izawol.371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Firm size and business cycles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Large firms tend to disproportionally lower investment when the real interest rate increases, total deposit growth declines, and economic policy uncertainty rises. This result is consistent with recent findings in the literature that large companies are more sensitive to economic cycles in advanced economies (Cravo, 2017) and contributing the most to economic fluctuations (Crouzet and Mehrotra, 2020). It suggests that supporting systemic firms during economic downturns could help better sustain the investment potential of the business sector.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Large firms tend to disproportionally lower investment when the real interest rate increases, total deposit growth declines, and economic policy uncertainty rises. This result is consistent with recent findings in the literature that large companies are more sensitive to economic cycles in advanced economies (Cravo, 2017) and contributing the most to economic fluctuations (Crouzet and Mehrotra, 2020). It suggests that supporting systemic firms during economic downturns could help better sustain the investment potential of the business sector.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Large firms tend to disproportionally lower investment when the real interest rate increases, total deposit growth declines, and economic policy uncertainty rises. This result is consistent with recent findings in the literature that large companies are more sensitive to economic cycles in advanced economies (Cravo, 2017) and contributing the most to economic fluctuations (Crouzet and Mehrotra, 2020). It suggests that supporting systemic firms during economic downturns could help better sustain the investment potential of the business sector.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Nevertheless, the results shown in Figure 2 provide a clear warning that firm ranking cannot assume that the correlations among employment size, wages, and productivity are positive, as suggested in Moscarini and Postel-Vinay (2012). 18 The stylized facts about employment cyclicality are complex, and, as Cravo (2017) notes, recent studies are improving our understanding of employment cyclicality by indicating that other aspects such as the age of firms, credit constraints, and the use of direct productivity proxies are important. 18 Table 2 shows that the correlations between TFP and employment, wages, and labor productivity are weak.…”
Section: Figure 1-differential Growth and Cycles Brazil 2000-2014 (Ementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The result is a dataset that is a balanced longitudinal employment series with continuing firms that 11 Annual longitudinal linked employer-employee series were constructed before; however, this paper overcomes the computational difficulties and constructs, for the first-time, monthly job flow longitudinal data to study employment dynamics. A simple exercise using part of this data can be seen in Cravo (2017). appear both in RAIS and PIA in January 2000 and encompasses 4,988,557 workers as of December 2014.…”
Section: Manufacturing Sector Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation