2002
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.905001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Firm Performance and Size in Liberalized Era: The Indian Case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Risk is expected to drive the cost of financing as well as need external financing upwards, and both these reasons drive the profitability down. A negative relationship was supported by empirical studies (Kakani and Kaul, 2002;Narang and Kaur, 2014). However, in a scenario when managers can control the debt-related perils, a positive relationship is observed (Zainudin et al, 2018).…”
Section: Growthmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Risk is expected to drive the cost of financing as well as need external financing upwards, and both these reasons drive the profitability down. A negative relationship was supported by empirical studies (Kakani and Kaul, 2002;Narang and Kaur, 2014). However, in a scenario when managers can control the debt-related perils, a positive relationship is observed (Zainudin et al, 2018).…”
Section: Growthmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It is used to establish a negative relationship between shareholder value and the higher proportion of debt component in the capital structure of Indian companies. Kakani and Kaul (2002) explained that higher leverage or poor solvency position reduces a firm's financial flexibility, apart from increasing its financial and bankruptcy risk. It implies that a higher debt component in the capital structure puts extra pressure of fixed interest burden on the firms.…”
Section: Unsystematic Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Newer and smaller firms, as a result, take away market share in spite of disadvantages like lack of capital, brand names and corporate reputation with older firms. Kakani and Kaul (2002) found that older firms are unable to react quickly to the recessionary phase while the younger companies are a lot more agile and open to the opportunities that come with the opening up of the sector that helps them to adapt changing trends and customer preferences. Raman and Dangwal (2003) also identified that the continuous use of outdated management and marketing practices along with the obsolete technology used by older firms are the main causes of their lesser growth.…”
Section: Framework Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%