2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10644-007-9030-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Firm performance and privatization in Ukraine

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though there is ample evidence for the presence of soft budget constraints, the empirical link between companies' performance (Djankov and Murrell (2002), Rosevear (1999, 1999a), Grygorenko and Lutz (2007)) or investment (Lizal and Svejnar (2002), Perotti and Vesnaver (2004)) on one hand and state ownership on the other is weak.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though there is ample evidence for the presence of soft budget constraints, the empirical link between companies' performance (Djankov and Murrell (2002), Rosevear (1999, 1999a), Grygorenko and Lutz (2007)) or investment (Lizal and Svejnar (2002), Perotti and Vesnaver (2004)) on one hand and state ownership on the other is weak.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies find that there is no significant impact of private ownership on investment Rosevear, 1999a, 1999b). However, Grygorenko and Lutz (2007) show that majority state owned firms in Ukraine have a worse enterprise performance, but also that a higher state ownership stake improves firms' performance. Brown et al (2006) and Brown and Earle (2007) provide strong evidence that the impact privatization on total factor productivity is substantial in Ukraine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Other studies find that there is no significant impact of private ownership on investment (Estrin and Rosevear, , ). However, Grygorenko and Lutz () show that majority state owned firms in Ukraine have a worse enterprise performance, but also that a higher state ownership stake improves firms’ performance. Brown et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers declared that most of these studies found that privatization yields improvements in operating and financial performance of firms. Galyna Grygorenko and Stefan Lutz (2007) found for the Ukrainian enterprises that privatization positively influences labor productivity, sales and profitability. Roberts, Thompson, and Mikolajczyk (2008), using data from the 500 largest Polish manufacturing companies in 1993-1998, found that privatization via the firms acquired by foreign investors resulted in significantly larger and more profitable firms than were those that remained state owned.…”
Section: Some Recent Empirical Studies Of the Fdi And Privatization Rmentioning
confidence: 99%