1995
DOI: 10.1016/0379-7112(96)00008-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fireballs from deflagration and detonation of heterogeneous fuel-rich clouds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2. The measured average diameter and elevation using the video images were 28 m and 35 m, respectively, which were however over predicted by the usually used equations [4] for liquid hydrocarbons. Since peroxy-fuel vapors receive additional heat from decomposition and get some oxidizer from the molecule itself they burn faster.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2. The measured average diameter and elevation using the video images were 28 m and 35 m, respectively, which were however over predicted by the usually used equations [4] for liquid hydrocarbons. Since peroxy-fuel vapors receive additional heat from decomposition and get some oxidizer from the molecule itself they burn faster.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past there have been numerous investigations performed on the thermal radiation hazards of hydrocarbon fireballs e.g. of kerosene, diesel, gasoline, LNG (Liquefied Natural Gas), propane and others [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. The following parameters describe typical characteristics of a fireball: total mass of fuel (M), diameter (d), elevation (H), burn time (t b ) and irradiance (E).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may therefore be possible that piezoelectric pressure transducers would be, for a big explosive charge and in near-field, in a measure range where the pyroelectric property would be highlighted: it would be the case when transducers where placed within the space for the expansion of the fireball. Empirical formula [10] can be used to evaluate the radius of the fireball generated within fuel detonations, as a function of the mass of hydrocarbons. Nevertheless, these formulas do not allow determining the radius of the fireball associated with solid explosive detonations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is often difficult to achieve an accurate experimental measurement of these two parameters. To solve this problem, various types of thermal radiation models for fireballs, suitable for different fuels or explosives, have been proposed, including the Dorofeev model [20], the Baker model [21], and the Martinsen model [22]. The Baker model is a kind of semiempirical, universal, and static model, whose applicability to TBX has been demonstrated [15].…”
Section: Thermal Radiation Damage Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%