Fire and explosion at mutual major hazard installations: review of a case history

Shaluf, Ibrahim Mohamed; Fakhru’l‐Razi, A.; Shariff, Abdul Rashid Mohamed; Mustafa, S; Said, Aini Mat

doi:10.1016/s0950-4230(02)00094-3

Cited by 18 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, this should be a preceding step in strengthening their capabilities and abilities to deal with safety matter. For example, one of the causes that lead to a propagation of industrial accidents is due to a failure of inspection authority, lack of knowledge, poor monitoring, inspection deficiency and laxity in enforcement of the regulation that were identified as a government agency's discrepancies [38]. The accident consequences may even become worse if there is no participation from other stakeholders.…”

Section: Institutionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The development of an initial framework for multi-firm industrial safety management based on cooperative relationship: A Malaysia case study

Ramli

Mokhtar

Aziz

2014

International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Institutionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The development of an initial framework for multi-firm industrial safety management based on cooperative relationship: A Malaysia case study

Ramli

Mokhtar

Aziz

2014

International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…For example, Ibrahim, Fakharu’l-razi and Mustapha ( 2003b ) proposed a model to show the pre-condition stages of technological disasters. Details of this model have been raised by Shaluf et al ( 2003 ) and Ibrahim, Fakharu’l-razi and Aini ( 2003a ). This model consists of eight phases: inception of error, accumulation of errors, warning, failure of correction, disaster impending stages, triggering events, emergency stage and disaster.…”

Section: Thematic Analysis Of Disaster Management Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Conceptual change of disaster management models: A thematic analysis

Nojavan

Salehi

Omidvar

2018

Jàmbá

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Different models have been proposed for disaster management by researchers and agencies. Despite their efficiency in some locations, disasters are still a fundamental challenge in the way of sustainable development. The purpose of this research is developing a comprehensive conceptual model for disaster management using thematic analysis. In this regard, first, disaster management models are collected. In the next stage, the themes of each model are extracted and categorised in three phases. In the first phase that is descriptive coding, available elements in each model are extracted as code and the basic themes are recognised. Then, in the phase of interpretive coding, basic themes are classified in three categories that are called organising themes (i.e. hazard assessment, risk management and management actions). In the final phase, strategic management is selected as the global or overarching theme to integrate all the other themes. Based on thematic analysis, it can be concluded that disaster management has three main elements that are the three organising themes. Therefore, comprehensive model of disaster management should include these three elements and their sub-basic themes that is called the ideal or criterion type. Results showed that some scientists have looked at disaster management one dimensionally (one theme). Even in two-dimensional models, one dimension has advantage over the other one. While the proposed typology in this study showed that the comprehensive model should include all the three mentioned elements.

show abstract

“…Four investigation reports have been reviewed in detail. The reports were about fire and explosion at a fireworks factory (Shaluf et al, 2002a), fire and explosion at a petrochemical plant (Fakhru'l-razi et al, 2003), fire at a refinery (Shaluf et al, 2003a), and fire and explosion at mutual major hazard installations (Shaluf et al, 2003b). The main causes of the technological disasters were derived.…”

Section: Ibrahim-razi Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Technological disaster’s criteria and models

Shaluf

Ahmadun

Mustapha

2003

Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Technological disaster's criteria and models Ibrahim M. ShalufFakharul-razi AhmadunSa'ari Mustapha Article information:To cite this document: Ibrahim M. ShalufFakharul-razi AhmadunSa'ari Mustapha, (2003),"Technological disaster's criteria and models", DisasterIf you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.

show abstract

Fire and explosion at mutual major hazard installations: review of a case history

Cited by 18 publications

References 2 publications

The development of an initial framework for multi-firm industrial safety management based on cooperative relationship: A Malaysia case study

The development of an initial framework for multi-firm industrial safety management based on cooperative relationship: A Malaysia case study

Conceptual change of disaster management models: A thematic analysis

Technological disaster’s criteria and models

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About