2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00107-005-0041-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fire and bending properties of blockboard with fire retardant treated veneers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results revealed that the surface quality of the panel decreased as the ratio of re retardants increased. Previous work on FRT blockboard plywood found that increased chemical concentrations gave higher retention values which in turn resulted in better re resistance characteristics of the samples (Laufenberg et al 2006). However, this study indicates that surface roughness of the panels can be adversely in uenced by increased concentrations of re retardants.…”
Section: E E Ects Of Fire Retardants On Surface Characterization Of Ccontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Results revealed that the surface quality of the panel decreased as the ratio of re retardants increased. Previous work on FRT blockboard plywood found that increased chemical concentrations gave higher retention values which in turn resulted in better re resistance characteristics of the samples (Laufenberg et al 2006). However, this study indicates that surface roughness of the panels can be adversely in uenced by increased concentrations of re retardants.…”
Section: E E Ects Of Fire Retardants On Surface Characterization Of Ccontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…The improvements were limited by the relatively thin veneer of the dip-treated wood exposed during the fire testing. Specifically, more thorough treatment of the veneers could be achieved with pressure treatment and another level of fire performance could be achieved through treatment of the core (Laufenberg et al 2006). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fire retardants (FRs) for plastics and WPCs are completely different from those of wood materials 1. Wood is typically impregnated with solutions of FRs, commonly salts, such as monoammonium (MAP) and diammonium phosphate (DAP), ammonium sulfate, zinc chloride, sodium tetraborate, boric acid, and guanylurea phosphate 2–5. In plastics and WPCs, however, FRs are added as solids directly into the formulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%