1979
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0061813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finiteness and decidability:I

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
7

Year Published

1982
1982
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, decidable means that the diagonal X → X × X is complemented. See [7] and [1] for details. Since for most notions of negation the only fuzzy sets which are decidable are crisp, this notion is not useful in a fuzzy context.…”
Section: Kuratowski ÿNitenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, decidable means that the diagonal X → X × X is complemented. See [7] and [1] for details. Since for most notions of negation the only fuzzy sets which are decidable are crisp, this notion is not useful in a fuzzy context.…”
Section: Kuratowski ÿNitenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, we do not assume that x = y or x = y. In fact, by [1], such an assumption would allow us to work in a sub-universe (sub-topos) in which classical logic holds and would thus remove the whole point of working in intuitionistic logic.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This statement is a reformulation, in the absence of N, of the result of the first half of the proof given above. (See [1] for the connection between the sets n and finite sets B with decidable equality.) But this statement is not provable in intuitionistic type theory without the axiom of infinity.…”
Section: An Induction Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…De esta forma extendemos los resultados estudiados en [3] y [4]. La teoría que fundamenta estos estudios se puede consultar en [1], [2] y [5].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified