2020
DOI: 10.1002/rnc.5390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite‐time annular domain stability and stabilization for stochastic Markovian switching systems driven by Wiener and Poisson noises

Abstract: This paper studies finite‐time annular domain stability (FTADS) and stabilization for stochastic Markovian switching systems driven by both Wiener and Poisson noises. Firstly, new sufficient conditions, based on the common parameter approach (CPA)/mode‐dependent parameter approach (MDPA), are presented to make the stochastic Markovian switching systems FTADS. Secondly, the finite‐time annular domain stabilization (FTAD‐stabilization) is discussed. The state feedback controller (SFC) and the dynamic output feed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The corresponding AFTB criterion of the FES is derived in Theorem 1. Different from References 25,40, and 38, the LK in this article is constructed by two parts, truexfalse(tfalse)prefix−truexfalse(tfalse)$$ \overline{x}(t)-\mathcal{E}\overline{x}(t) $$ and truexfalse(tfalse)$$ \mathcal{E}\overline{x}(t) $$. Once truexfalse(tfalse)=0$$ \mathcal{E}\overline{x}(t)=0 $$, truevfalse(tfalse)=0$$ \mathcal{E}\overline{v}(t)=0 $$ and ωfalse(tfalse)=0$$ \omega (t)=0 $$ in FES (7), Theorem 1 can be regarded as a parallel development for discrete‐time case of Theorem 1 in Reference 28 with one mode and dfalse(tfalse)=0$$ d(t)=0 $$.…”
Section: Main Results Under Static Etmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding AFTB criterion of the FES is derived in Theorem 1. Different from References 25,40, and 38, the LK in this article is constructed by two parts, truexfalse(tfalse)prefix−truexfalse(tfalse)$$ \overline{x}(t)-\mathcal{E}\overline{x}(t) $$ and truexfalse(tfalse)$$ \mathcal{E}\overline{x}(t) $$. Once truexfalse(tfalse)=0$$ \mathcal{E}\overline{x}(t)=0 $$, truevfalse(tfalse)=0$$ \mathcal{E}\overline{v}(t)=0 $$ and ωfalse(tfalse)=0$$ \omega (t)=0 $$ in FES (7), Theorem 1 can be regarded as a parallel development for discrete‐time case of Theorem 1 in Reference 28 with one mode and dfalse(tfalse)=0$$ d(t)=0 $$.…”
Section: Main Results Under Static Etmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(15) Taking mathematical expectation of the whole of (15), and then integrating it from 0 to 𝑡, one has…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of output feedback control is extremely significant in order to avoid measuring the system state and to reduce external disturbances. For example, sufficient conditions for finite-time stabilization of 𝐼𝑡𝑜 ̂ stochastic systems with Markov switching under the action of two controllers were given in [15]. Yan et al designed state feedback controller and OBC through a mode-dependent approach, and gave a number of conditions for the existence of these with less conservativeness in [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many papers about finite-time annular domain stability and the systems in most of the papers involves only one of Markov chain and Poisson jump [1], [2], [5]. There are a few papers containing Markov chain and Poisson jump [3], [18]. All of them use the Lyapunov exponent and linear matrix inequality to give the sufficient condition for finite-time annular domain stability of stochastic systems [1]- [3], [5], [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%