2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-time adaptive sliding mode force control for electro-hydraulic load simulator based on improved GMS friction model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several types of control approaches had been proposed by researchers to control the nonlinear EHA system, such as linear quadratic regulator [6][7][8], PID controller [9][10][11], model predictive controller [12][13][14], backstepping controller [15][16][17], sliding mode controller [18][19][20][21], and other hybrid controllers [22][23][24]. However, the PID controller is still the main choice for industrial applications due to its fast design process, simple structure, and robust control performance [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several types of control approaches had been proposed by researchers to control the nonlinear EHA system, such as linear quadratic regulator [6][7][8], PID controller [9][10][11], model predictive controller [12][13][14], backstepping controller [15][16][17], sliding mode controller [18][19][20][21], and other hybrid controllers [22][23][24]. However, the PID controller is still the main choice for industrial applications due to its fast design process, simple structure, and robust control performance [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydraulic systems have been extensively employed in sundry industrial applications by utilizing the advantages of large force/torque output capability and small size-to-power ratios, such as automotive active suspensions (Huang et al, 2018; Ma et al, 2019; Sun et al, 2015), hydraulic load simulators (Kang et al, 2018; Wang et al, 2018; Yao et al, 2013), robots and manipulators (Chen and Fu, 2015; Montazeri et al, 2017), aircraft actuators (Sente et al, 2012), and so on. However, the existence of various modeling uncertainties and high nonlinear behaviors make it complicated for developing high-performance closed-loop controllers (Yang et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A substantial amount of work on nonlinear adaptive and Sliding Mode Control (SMC) methods has been reported in the literature in relation to friction rejection. The reader is indicatively referred to [28,29,30,31,32,33], as well as to [34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41]. Although the powerful robustness properties of these controller families have been extensively analysed, their performance and applicability to machine tool control had not been adequately assessed, especially in comparison to the conventional P-PI cascades.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%