2011
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/24/3/035103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-size scaling analysis of isotropic–polar phase transitions in an amphiphilic fluid

Abstract: We present Monte Carlo simulations of the isotropic-polar (IP) phase transition in an amphiphilic fluid carried out in the isothermal-isobaric ensemble. Our model consists of Lennard-Jones spheres where the attractive part of the potential is modified by an orientation-dependent function. This function gives rise to an angle dependence of the intermolecular attractions corresponding to that characteristic of point dipoles. Our data show a substantial system-size dependence of the dipolar order parameter. We an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the entries in table 1 reveal, these ratios turn out to be nearly the same for both universality classes. Therefore, use of the correct set of critical exponents affects the plots presented in figures 8-10 of [1] only very marginally as we have verified. Therefore, we conclude that for the present range of system sizes a successful rescaling of quantities such as |m| , χ, or even P N , is insufficient to distinguish between the universality classes of the 3D Ising magnet and the classical 3D Heisenberg fluid.…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As the entries in table 1 reveal, these ratios turn out to be nearly the same for both universality classes. Therefore, use of the correct set of critical exponents affects the plots presented in figures 8-10 of [1] only very marginally as we have verified. Therefore, we conclude that for the present range of system sizes a successful rescaling of quantities such as |m| , χ, or even P N , is insufficient to distinguish between the universality classes of the 3D Ising magnet and the classical 3D Heisenberg fluid.…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
“…Assuming, in addition, hyperscaling to be valid, we can also compute the critical exponent γ . The results summarized in table 1 indicate that our amphiphilic fluid pertains to the universality class of the classical 3D Heisenberg fluid, unlike what we had surmised in our earlier work [1]. However, it turns out that regardless of whether one uses the critical exponents of the 3D Ising universality class or those of the 3D Heisenberg universality class one can rescale |m| , χ, and P(m) such that data obtained for different system sizes collapse onto unique master curves (see figures 8-10 of [1]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 46%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, there exist many simple generic models to test the validity of the two-length-scales hypothesis, mostly based on isotropic central potentials 36,[49][50][51][52][53] . Models with anisotropic interactions are far more scarce due to the added complexity imposed by the directional bonds [54][55][56] . In the case of water, however, the strong impact of the directionality of the hydrogen bond on its properties makes the use of isotropic potentials particularly challenging, imposing a fine tuning of the model parameters in order to reproduce the desired properties 57,58 Perhaps the simplest model of water that incorporates a directional bonding scheme was introduced by Ben-Naim in the early 1970s to obtain a qualitative representation of the open hydrogen-bonded network of molecules that makes up liquid water 59,60 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%