1988
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-1988-0920167-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite order solutions of second order linear differential equations

Abstract: ABSTRACT. We consider the differential equation /" + A(z)f + B(z)f = 0 where A(z) and B(z) are entire functions.We will find conditions on A(z) and B(z) which will guarantee that every solution / ^ 0 of the equation will have infinite order. We will also find conditions on A(z) and B(z) which will guarantee that any finite order solution / ^ 0 of the equation will not have zero as a Borel exceptional value. We will also show that if A(z) and B(z) satisfy certain growth conditions, then any finite order solutio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classical growth comparisons between f (z) and f ′ (z) have important applications to differential equations (see e.g. [14], [16]). In the case of applying Nevanlinna theory to difference equations, one of the most basic questions is the growth comparison between T (r, f (z + 1)) and T (r, f (z)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical growth comparisons between f (z) and f ′ (z) have important applications to differential equations (see e.g. [14], [16]). In the case of applying Nevanlinna theory to difference equations, one of the most basic questions is the growth comparison between T (r, f (z + 1)) and T (r, f (z)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gundersen [5,Theorem 6] has extended Theorem A to obtain the conclusion of our theorem under the more restrictive hypothesis p(h) < p(g) < 5 . Thus our contribution is to treat the case p(g) = \ .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…As noted in [6], if A(z) and B(z) are entire such that ρ(A) < ρ(B), then (1.2) implies that all solutions f ≡ 0 of (1.1) are of infinite order. More specifically, if ρ(A) = ρ(B) > 0 but the T -types satisfy τ (A) < τ (B), where…”
Section: Infinite Order Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The remaining assertion is a trivial consequence of (2.1). If A(z) and B(z) are entire such that ρ(B) < ρ(A) ≤ 1/2, then all solutions of (1.1) are of infinite order [6], [10]. For any integer n ≥ 1, finite order solutions may occur in the case…”
Section: Infinite Order Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%