Finite Element Analysis 2010
DOI: 10.5772/10218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Element Modelling of Elastic-Plastic Contact of Rough Surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of NS LMXBs in GCs as well as part of the CV population appears to scale with the stellar encounter rate of their host cluster, indicating that they are indeed produced through dynamical mechanisms (Gendre et al 2003;Pooley et al 2003;Pooley & Hut 2006). The same correlation is observed with MSPs in GCs detected in radio (Hui et al 2010), and even in γ -rays (Abdo et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The number of NS LMXBs in GCs as well as part of the CV population appears to scale with the stellar encounter rate of their host cluster, indicating that they are indeed produced through dynamical mechanisms (Gendre et al 2003;Pooley et al 2003;Pooley & Hut 2006). The same correlation is observed with MSPs in GCs detected in radio (Hui et al 2010), and even in γ -rays (Abdo et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…If DM particles annihilate or decay into SM particles, the signature of the final products of such processes may be detected up to some uncertainty in the astrophysical background component. In order to set constraints on the diverse DM models and get a better understanding of the astrophysical factor associated with the distribution of this kind of matter, numerous signals detected in gamma-rays, neutrinos, positrons, antiprotons and other particles have been studied in the available literature [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Most of these analysis make use of Monte Carlo event generator packages, that allow to predict the spectra of final-state particles generated by DM annihilation and decays into SM particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. In this case, the photon fluxes would be in the range detectable by space-based gamma ray observatories [16] such as EGRET [20] and FERMI [21,22], with better sensitivities around 30 MeV-300 GeV.…”
Section: Gamma Raysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particles that might either make non astrophysical gamma rays and/or need to be rejected as background are included. The model does not include X-rays nor soft gamma rays that might cause individual detectors within the LAT to be activated [21,22]. Recent investigations [23] have looked for potential DM subhalos targets for ACTs and FERMI at energies higher than 100 GeV claiming that multi-wavelength observations could play an essential role in DM indirect searches.…”
Section: Fermimentioning
confidence: 99%