2022
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4084322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Element Modelling for Footwear Design and Evaluation: A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, this suggests the importance of correctly defining the materials’ properties in certain product areas, such as stitched and perforated ones. In existing studies [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ], the properties are considered homogeneous over the entire surface of the footwear’s upper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, this suggests the importance of correctly defining the materials’ properties in certain product areas, such as stitched and perforated ones. In existing studies [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ], the properties are considered homogeneous over the entire surface of the footwear’s upper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the available data for simulating a shoe’s upper assembly are limited due to the large variety of materials and manufacturing operations applied to these materials. The entire footwear product, including uppers, is rarely evaluated using finite element analysis because of the difficulty of experimental control [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ]. Ruperez et al [ 28 ] described the mechanical behaviour of two types of calfskin for uppers by calculating Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio from the tensile test, intending to use these data to simulate the behaviour of the footwear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation