2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element modeling of burst failure in unbonded flexible risers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The assumptions and calculation results of each model were compared and discussed. Cuamatzi-Melendez et al (2015) considered the contact nonlinearity and physical nonlinearity caused by the contact between the two layers of the internal pressureresistant layer in the numerical model and compared the modified model to various existing theoretical models, demonstrating the importance of the numerical simulation in the analysis of internal pressure resistance. Paumier et al (2010) first introduced the modeling principles and main assumptions for calculating the external pressure collapse of flexible pipes in the straight pipe condition before delving into the model's applicability to the bent pipe condition.…”
Section: Progress Of Theoretical and Simulation Research On The Perfo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assumptions and calculation results of each model were compared and discussed. Cuamatzi-Melendez et al (2015) considered the contact nonlinearity and physical nonlinearity caused by the contact between the two layers of the internal pressureresistant layer in the numerical model and compared the modified model to various existing theoretical models, demonstrating the importance of the numerical simulation in the analysis of internal pressure resistance. Paumier et al (2010) first introduced the modeling principles and main assumptions for calculating the external pressure collapse of flexible pipes in the straight pipe condition before delving into the model's applicability to the bent pipe condition.…”
Section: Progress Of Theoretical and Simulation Research On The Perfo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, the suction anchor foundation is a large structure with the tens of meters height and considerable costs [20,21]. Although there are some studies on subsea manifolds, buoy [22][23][24][25], flexible pipes or risers [26][27][28][29][30][31] and mooring systems [32][33][34][35][36][37], there is no such concept that combines the two parts and keeps manifold suspending in the water and creates a 3D subsea production system. Here, the new subsea manifold is suspended with the buoy, and the flexible pipes may be used to be the mooring systems as well as the transporting oil and gas pipelines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%