2006
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-950x(2006)132:5(337)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite-Element Computation of Wave-Structure Interaction between Steep Stokes Waves and Vertical Cylinders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alongside this work, several fully nonlinear solutions have also been proposed: finite-element solutions provided by Ma et al [10,11], Kim et al [12] and Eatock Taylor et al [13]; and boundary element solutions by Bai & Eatock Taylor [14] and Zhou et al [15]. While these solutions are undoubtedly important, several cases highlighting the importance of nonlinear effects, the focus of this paper lies in a physical explanation for the occurrence of unexpected high-frequency wave scattering, a clear explanation as to why low-order diffraction solutions are inappropriate and, perhaps most importantly, a description as to why these effects are potentially very important in the context of offshore engineering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alongside this work, several fully nonlinear solutions have also been proposed: finite-element solutions provided by Ma et al [10,11], Kim et al [12] and Eatock Taylor et al [13]; and boundary element solutions by Bai & Eatock Taylor [14] and Zhou et al [15]. While these solutions are undoubtedly important, several cases highlighting the importance of nonlinear effects, the focus of this paper lies in a physical explanation for the occurrence of unexpected high-frequency wave scattering, a clear explanation as to why low-order diffraction solutions are inappropriate and, perhaps most importantly, a description as to why these effects are potentially very important in the context of offshore engineering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical scheme adopted for these fully nonlinear simulations was the mixed Eulerian-Lagrangian higher-order boundary element method (BEM) described by [12,13]. Other numerical solution approaches for the potential-flow diffraction problem in the nonlinear wave regime include a finite-element computation based on Hamilton's principle [14], and a nonlinear decomposition method to solve for the diffracted wave field assuming the incident wave is explicitly known as described by [15] and recently investigated in more detail in [16]. Viscous flow solvers have also been used in order to describe the physics of the interaction more comprehensively, including the hybrid finite volume-volume of fluid method adopted by [17] and a spectral wave explicit Navier-Stokes equations solver used by [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In shallow water, and for large waves where nonlinearity and dispersion effects are significant, the use of shallow-water wave equations is inevitable, see, e.g., Kim et al [37], Swan and Sheikh [66], for the effects of nonlinearity and wave steepness on wave loads on a vertical cylinder. Studies on solitary and cnoidal wave loads on vertical cylinders are very limited, see Apelt and Piorewicz [2], Wang et al [71], Yang and Ertekin [80], Wang and Jiang [70], Yates and Wang [81], Zhong and Wang [86].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bai and Taylor [3] used the domain decomposition method to study the fully nonlinear wave diffraction of linear waves by a vertical cylinder in monochromatic waves as well as focused, group waves. Kim et al [36,37] used the finite-element method to study the timedomain propagation of Stokes waves and their interaction with vertical cylinders and compared the run-up with the stream function theory of Ferrant [23]. Nonlinear loads on vertical cylinders and floating bodies in irregular waves are studied by Sclavounos [61,62] through the time derivative of the fluid impulse.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%