2020
DOI: 10.3390/app10072209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Piers Including a Flexure-Shear Interaction Model

Abstract: This paper discusses the seismic behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) bridge structures, focusing on the shear–flexure interaction phenomena. The assessment of reinforced concrete bridges under seismic action needs the ability to model the effective non-linear response in order to identify the relevant failure modes of the structure. Existing RC bridges have been conceived according to old engineering practices and codes, lacking the implementation of capacity design principles, and therefore can exhibit prema… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher stiffness of the numerical model can be explained by the fact that the model does not take into account potential movements, slips and deformations in the test set-up, which is a common observation. Similar differences between the results of the experiments and simulations (in terms of displacements in the elastic phase) were also found in [ 19 , 23 , 33 , 50 ]. Experimental and FE load vs. displacement curves are plotted in Figure 10 .…”
Section: Finite Element Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The higher stiffness of the numerical model can be explained by the fact that the model does not take into account potential movements, slips and deformations in the test set-up, which is a common observation. Similar differences between the results of the experiments and simulations (in terms of displacements in the elastic phase) were also found in [ 19 , 23 , 33 , 50 ]. Experimental and FE load vs. displacement curves are plotted in Figure 10 .…”
Section: Finite Element Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…It provides great opportunities to analyse structures composed of various materials, e.g., reinforced concrete or masonry [17][18][19]. The use of advanced material models allows analysis of structural load-bearing capacity, damage development [20][21][22][23], changes in stress state and adhesion deformation and reinforcement anchoring [24][25][26]. Despite the development of knowledge and the continuous increase of computing power, it is not yet possible to build a numerical model of a structure enabling a global analysis that includes all physical phenomena.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Φ(•) is the standard normal cumulative distribution function, ln(•) is the natural logaritm, and µ i and β i are, respectively the median value and the lognormal standard deviation of I m associated with damage state LS i . The development of fragility curves can be performed through observation of the empirical or damage sustained by homogeneous class of bridges [37] or through analytical methods, for the most part, based on the use of computational tools such as finite elements [38][39][40].…”
Section: Bridge Seismic Vulnerabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lumped plasticity models are simplistic. Therefore, some phenomena observed in reinforced concrete structures (e.g., buckling of rebar bars in compression, bond-slip [40]) cannot be directly simulated. These phenomena are taken into account only indirectly through the empirical-based regression equations for the estimation of the limit-state deformation capacity, which is usual practice in the assessment.…”
Section: Description Of Mathematical Model For Nonlinear Seismic Analysis Of Rc Frame Buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%