2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Element Analysis of Rectangular Defects in Inspection of Steel Pipelines using Magnetic Flux Leakage Technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the former case, a defect or failure causes high losses of product, energy, capital and can even cause human and environmental damages. Consequently, the inspection on pipelines over regular periods of time is critical (Sorabh, Raghav and Sengar, 2017). The proposal modification presented in Section 3 may be an alternative to model the inspection interval to this specific context.…”
Section: Possible Applications For Revised Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the former case, a defect or failure causes high losses of product, energy, capital and can even cause human and environmental damages. Consequently, the inspection on pipelines over regular periods of time is critical (Sorabh, Raghav and Sengar, 2017). The proposal modification presented in Section 3 may be an alternative to model the inspection interval to this specific context.…”
Section: Possible Applications For Revised Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of research objects, Antipov and Markov selected rail defects and transverse cracks for analysis [3] ; Cheng et al proposed the idea of solenoid-Z-typed and V-typed defects [4] . Trevino et al analyzed conical defects and cylindrical hole-like defects employing hypothesis simulation [5] ; Sorabh and Sengar's work involved pipeline magnetic flux leakage, but they only analyzed the characterization of a specific defect, then made the simulation of circumferential defect layers and radial defect layers of it [6] . Li et al studied residual strength assessment methods of submarine pipelines with dent defects, besides comparing and analyzing the differences in dent defect assessment methods in DNV-RP-F107, PDAM, and API 579 specifications [7] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%