2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element analysis of punching shear behaviour of concrete slabs supported on rectangular columns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stress–strain relationship of the concrete under uniaxial compression was represented based on Hognestad parabola (Genikomsou and Polak, 2015), which can be subdivided into three parts (Figure 2). The first part O-A represents the linear elastic branch, assumed until 0.4fc' and adopting the initial elasticity modulus, Ec=5000fc' (Laguta, 2020; Milligan, 2018; Stoner, 2015). The second segment A-B shows the nonlinear ascending branch with the modulus of elasticity Et=5500fc', which is tangent to the parabola at the origin.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The stress–strain relationship of the concrete under uniaxial compression was represented based on Hognestad parabola (Genikomsou and Polak, 2015), which can be subdivided into three parts (Figure 2). The first part O-A represents the linear elastic branch, assumed until 0.4fc' and adopting the initial elasticity modulus, Ec=5000fc' (Laguta, 2020; Milligan, 2018; Stoner, 2015). The second segment A-B shows the nonlinear ascending branch with the modulus of elasticity Et=5500fc', which is tangent to the parabola at the origin.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the steel reinforcement stress–strain relationship was assumed to be elastically perfectly plastic, with the elastic modulus equal to 200,000 MPa according to ACI318-19. The Poisson’s ratio for reinforcement was usually set to 0.3 (Genikomsou and Polak, 2015; Laguta, 2020; Milligan, 2018).…”
Section: Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous FEA of slabs supported on rectangular columns [10] and walls [11] has shown that the shear stresses along the column perimeter and the critical perimeters assumed in design codes, mainly that assumed in ACI 318-19 [5], are non-uniform and typically concentrate along the short sides and near the corners of the column. Similar stress concentrations are expected for slabs supported on L-shaped columns, and as such, it is hypothesized that the diagonal portion of the critical perimeter shown in Fig.…”
Section: Punching Shear Design Of L-shaped Slab-column Connections According To Aci 318-19 and Eurocode 2 (2004)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental work is too expensive to investigate one parameter, and became more expensive if it does to investigate many parameters. A numerical approach using a finite element method (FEM) has been done by [6] - [9] to investigate the behavior of interior column-slab connections and show that the approach gives good results compared to the experimental results. Also, detailed mechanisms of stress and strain distributions of materials are difficult to visualize in experimental work, however, they can be easily obtained using finite element analysis [10] and [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%