2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element analysis of helical piles subjected to axial impact loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model's horizontal limit was considered 1.5 times the total length of the pile, while the lower limit was set at a depth of 2.5 times the total length of the pile (1.5 L * 2.5 L). These values are greater than the minimums (L * 2 L) recommended by Alwalan and El Naggar [16]. The lateral boundaries allow vertical displacements and restrict horizontal displacements and rotations, while the lower boundary restricts all displacements and rotations.…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The model's horizontal limit was considered 1.5 times the total length of the pile, while the lower limit was set at a depth of 2.5 times the total length of the pile (1.5 L * 2.5 L). These values are greater than the minimums (L * 2 L) recommended by Alwalan and El Naggar [16]. The lateral boundaries allow vertical displacements and restrict horizontal displacements and rotations, while the lower boundary restricts all displacements and rotations.…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The PLAXIS 2D finite element software was used to model the piles, which makes it possible to perform stress deformation analysis and predict the behavior of piles subjected to static and dynamic axial loads [16,23].…”
Section: Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To accurately simulate the response of the soil to static and dynamic impact loading developed by static and dynamic load testing, the model dimensions must be located far enough away from the studied pile to eliminate boundary effects. The recommended model size (L × 2L), according to their studies [27,[34][35][36][37], should be used for optimal accuracy and calculating efficiency. Moreover, the model geometry is evaluated by changing the position of the vertical and horizontal boundaries until the calculated responses converge to a constant value at the pile head.…”
Section: Model Geometry and Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This resistance reduced the impact of cyclic loading by reducing the amplitude of settlement of soil but with less effect than the case of several helices. Alwalan and Naggar [12] reported that the spacing ratio does not influence an HSDT (High Strain Dynamic Test) in a statistically meaningful manner.…”
Section: Effect Of Helical Spacing Using Hardening Soil Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%