1995
DOI: 10.1109/16.370061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element analysis of Hall effect and magnetoresistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For these reasons, several numerical formulations have emerged in the last two decades. The finite difference method was applied in [105], [104] and the FEM was used to study the Hall effect in [23]. The mentioned FEM formulation is very simple and not fully coupled, consisting on an electric element with anisotropic electric conductivity and magnetic-dependency of the conductivity tensor introduced as data.…”
Section: Other Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons, several numerical formulations have emerged in the last two decades. The finite difference method was applied in [105], [104] and the FEM was used to study the Hall effect in [23]. The mentioned FEM formulation is very simple and not fully coupled, consisting on an electric element with anisotropic electric conductivity and magnetic-dependency of the conductivity tensor introduced as data.…”
Section: Other Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8][9] In the latter case, the influence of geometry on the overall response has been explicitly known for simply connected two-dimensional structures with pointlike contacts exposed to a homogeneous magnetic field B. 1,9,[11][12][13][14][15][16] Whatever their mathematical basis, these methods implement some procedure to solve the transport problem in the sample at B 0, which implies its own challenges. 1,9,[11][12][13][14][15][16] Whatever their mathematical basis, these methods implement some procedure to solve the transport problem in the sample at B 0, which implies its own challenges.…”
Section: Explicit Connection Between Sample Geometry and Hall Responsementioning
confidence: 99%