Finite element analysis of GPS based vehicle tracking system with enclosure for dynamic assessment

Analytical Survey for Assuring Quality Standards in GPS based Tracking System

“…Except Iman M. Almomani et al [6], G.Rajendran et al [14], and A.Yakzan et al [17], all techniques used tracking mechanism for safety purpose. Iman M. Almomani et al [6], Shreenivas Jog et al [7], Mashiur Rahman et al [10], B.Pournima et al [16], and P.Verma et al [13] follow robustness by showing great stability and robust message transfer protocol, while rest of the techniques do not have this quality parameter. All techniques can be formally validated except Pattarakamon Rangsee et al [8] O.O.Alharaki et al [12], Dalip et al [15] and B.Pournima et al [16] which do not show any concern about validation .In some techniques simulation method is used for validation purpose.…”

“…All techniques can be formally validated except Pattarakamon Rangsee et al [8] O.O.Alharaki et al [12], Dalip et al [15] and B.Pournima et al [16] which do not show any concern about validation .In some techniques simulation method is used for validation purpose. Only few techniques B.Pournima et al [16], M.S.Sutaon et al [5], Iman M. Almomani et al [6], Shreenivas Jog et al [7], Pattarakamon Rangsee et al [8], Georges Challita et al [4] and R.Immanuel Rajkumar et al [9] are verified through experimentation and different types of testing while the rest are not verifiable. Most of the techniques are simpler and easy to use so that they can be used by nontechnical audience but Shreenivas Jog et al [7], A.Takewade et al [11], Dalip et al [15], A.Yakzan et al [17], and A.S.Nookabdi et al [20] do not follow ease of usability.…”

“…Only few techniques B.Pournima et al [16], M.S.Sutaon et al [5], Iman M. Almomani et al [6], Shreenivas Jog et al [7], Pattarakamon Rangsee et al [8], Georges Challita et al [4] and R.Immanuel Rajkumar et al [9] are verified through experimentation and different types of testing while the rest are not verifiable. Most of the techniques are simpler and easy to use so that they can be used by nontechnical audience but Shreenivas Jog et al [7], A.Takewade et al [11], Dalip et al [15], A.Yakzan et al [17], and A.S.Nookabdi et al [20] do not follow ease of usability. Almost half of the techniques surveyed are easy to maintain and provide accurate data while the rest half of the techniques have low maintainability.…”