The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2008
DOI: 10.1002/9780470409732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Element Analysis of Antennas and Arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
126
0
9

Year Published

2010
2010
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
126
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…1). Interpreting the material behavior in ⍀ PML as anisotropic, dispersive, and lossy, the governing equation for r ⍀ = ⍀ S ഫ ⍀ PML takes the following general form [17]:…”
Section: Formulation Of the Transient Topology Optimization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). Interpreting the material behavior in ⍀ PML as anisotropic, dispersive, and lossy, the governing equation for r ⍀ = ⍀ S ഫ ⍀ PML takes the following general form [17]:…”
Section: Formulation Of the Transient Topology Optimization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, time-domain methods can accommodate strongly nonlinear or active (time-varying) media, whereas frequency methods have difficulties with these physical regimes because the frequency is no longer preserved. Two of the major challenges of the FETD method are the computational cost associated with the computation of the sensitivities and the implementation of efficient absorbing boundary conditions (ABCs), such as the perfectly matched layer (PML) [17]. To the authors' knowledge, a topology optimization scheme based on the FETD method using PMLs as ABCs has not been reported before.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, time-domain FEM techniques have recently been developed [8,13,14], allowing electromagnetic phenomena to be modeled directly in the time domain. In [8], for instance, the spatially and temporally varying electric field is approximated using interpolatory spatial vector basis functions defined on tetrahedral elements, with time-dependent field-distribution coefficients, which are determined solving the corresponding second-order ordinary differential equation in time by a time-marching procedure. When compared to frequency-domain FEM solutions, time-domain FEM formulations enable effective modeling of time-varying and nonlinear problems and fast broadband simulations (provide broadband information in a single run), at the expense of the additional discretization -in time domain, and the associated numerical complexities, programming and implementation difficulties, and stability and other problems inherent for time-domain computational electromagnetic approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, timedomain analysis and characterization of such structures and evaluation of associated transient electromagnetic phenomena are also of great practical importance for a number of well-established and emerging areas of applied electromagnetics, including wideband communication, electromagnetic compatibility, electromagnetic interference, packaging, high-speed microwave electronics, signal integrity, material characterization, and other applications [11][12][13]. For this purpose, time-domain FEM techniques have recently been developed [8,13,14], allowing electromagnetic phenomena to be modeled directly in the time domain. In [8], for instance, the spatially and temporally varying electric field is approximated using interpolatory spatial vector basis functions defined on tetrahedral elements, with time-dependent field-distribution coefficients, which are determined solving the corresponding second-order ordinary differential equation in time by a time-marching procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation