1995
DOI: 10.3109/00016489509121918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fine Structures of Utricle of Developing Chick Embryo Exposed to 2G Gravity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The size of otoconia is increased in animals subjected to microgravity (Wiederhold et al 1997), while animals born in hypergravity, have smaller otoconia (Krasnov 1991;Lim et al 1974;Sondag et al 1996), thinner utricular membranes (Lim et al 1974) with increased crosssectional areas of epithelial cells (Wubbels et al 2002). In addition, a delayed growth was observed in hamsters (Sondag et al 1996) as in fish and chicks (Anken et al 2001a, b;Hara et al 1995). Under hypergravity, a delay was found in the postnatal development of connections between type I hair cells in the utricles and their afferent calyces (Gaboyard et al 2003), and a slower development of the potassium currents in type II hair cell was reported (Chabbert et al 2003), and poorly developed saccular axons with few or no side branches or synapticlike terminals were found in the medial vestibular nucleus (Bruce 2003), while axonal branches of posterior canal axons differed in rat fetuses that developed in microgravity (Bruce and Fritzsch 1997) suggesting a delay in synaptogenesis in the medial vestibular nuclei.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The size of otoconia is increased in animals subjected to microgravity (Wiederhold et al 1997), while animals born in hypergravity, have smaller otoconia (Krasnov 1991;Lim et al 1974;Sondag et al 1996), thinner utricular membranes (Lim et al 1974) with increased crosssectional areas of epithelial cells (Wubbels et al 2002). In addition, a delayed growth was observed in hamsters (Sondag et al 1996) as in fish and chicks (Anken et al 2001a, b;Hara et al 1995). Under hypergravity, a delay was found in the postnatal development of connections between type I hair cells in the utricles and their afferent calyces (Gaboyard et al 2003), and a slower development of the potassium currents in type II hair cell was reported (Chabbert et al 2003), and poorly developed saccular axons with few or no side branches or synapticlike terminals were found in the medial vestibular nucleus (Bruce 2003), while axonal branches of posterior canal axons differed in rat fetuses that developed in microgravity (Bruce and Fritzsch 1997) suggesting a delay in synaptogenesis in the medial vestibular nuclei.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This process was observed in different species including snails (Wiederhold et al, 2003a), aplysia (Pedrozo et al, 1996), fish (Wiederhold et al, 1997; Anken et al, 2001, 2002a,b; Wiederhold et al, 2003a,b), Xenopus (Lychakov and Lavrova, 1985), chicken (Hara et al, 1995), hamsters (Sondag et al, 1996), rats (Lim et al, 1974; Krasnov, 1991). At variance the otoconia of animals exposed to altered gravity at maturity did not show any change (Lim et al, 1974; Ross et al, 1985; Hara et al, 1995; Sondag et al, 1995). Some of these results supported the existence of a critical period during the development of otoliths (Wiederhold et al, 2003a,b).…”
Section: Effects Of Altered Gravity On the Development Of Gravity Senmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the other hand otolith size increased significantly in the developing snail and fish exposed to microgravity (186). Studies in Aplysia (187), Xenopus laevis (188) chicks (189,190), hamsters (191,192) and rats (193) suggest that, after the otolith/otoconia develops, subsequent exposures to either hypergravity or microgravity have little effect on their morphology. However, hamsters exposed to an altered gravitational environment during their development show subtle changes in the otoconia in terms of the relative distribution of the small, medium and large otoconia (192).…”
Section: Vestibular System and Signal Detectionmentioning
confidence: 98%