Abstract:This project used the Colorado Client Assessment Record to compare individuals being seen by mental health teams in primary care with individuals being seen in outpatient services in the same community and to look at the implications for service delivery. While more individuals with a psychotic illness were seen in outpatient settings, many individuals seen in primary care had similar levels of need to those in outpatient clinics. Family physicians were more actively involved in the care of patients being seen… Show more
“… 19 The founder of the shared care model (the Canadian Collaboration Mental Health Initiative) defined shared care as ‘collaborative mental healthcare models of practice in which consumers, their families and caregivers, together with healthcare providers from a variety of primary healthcare and mental health settings—each with different experience, training, knowledge and expertise—work together to provide better coordinated and more effective services for individuals with mental health needs’. 34 These services include mental health promotion, illness prevention, detection and treatment of mental illnesses, rehabilitation and recovery support. Shared care can encompass a broad range of activities, such as regular visits by a mental healthcare worker to a primary healthcare setting and regular telephone consultations between primary healthcare and mental healthcare providers.…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shared care is a collaboration between general practice and mental health services and enables a ‘best of both worlds’ scenario with the opportunity to provide high-quality holistic care to support the recovery process of people with mental health difficulties 19. The founder of the shared care model (the Canadian Collaboration Mental Health Initiative) defined shared care as ‘collaborative mental healthcare models of practice in which consumers, their families and caregivers, together with healthcare providers from a variety of primary healthcare and mental health settings—each with different experience, training, knowledge and expertise—work together to provide better coordinated and more effective services for individuals with mental health needs’ 34. These services include mental health promotion, illness prevention, detection and treatment of mental illnesses, rehabilitation and recovery support.…”
IntroductionMental health illness represents one of the greatest health burdens in the world. It is well documented that treatment of these illnesses could be optimised through strengthened collaboration between general practice and specialised mental healthcare services (shared care). Furthermore, involvement of users in the design of new interventions to strengthen end-user value and sustainability is key. Therefore, the aim of this study is to develop a shared care intervention in co-production with users.Methods and analysisThe study will take place at psychiatric outpatient clinics in Denmark.The project is described in four sequential steps, each informing and leading into the next: a systematic review (step 1) will be followed by an exploratory study investigating how stakeholders (general practitioners, mental healthcare staff and patients) perceive existing treatment and collaboration between general practice and mental health services. Steps 1 and 2 will inform and qualify the intervention that will be developed in step 3 as a co-creation study. Step 4 will assess the intervention in a feasibility study. Step 4 will be designed as a non-randomised intervention study with a control group with preassessments and postassessments. In total, 240 patients will be recruited. Questionnaires will be administered to the participants at their first visit to an outpatient clinic and again after 3 months. The primary outcome will be patients’ self-reported mental health status (Short Form Health Survey, SF-36) and recovery (revised Recovery Assessment Scale, RAS-R). Recruitment will take place from June 2023 to May 2024.Ethics and disseminationThe project is approved by the ethics committee (REG-016–2022). Informed consent based on written and verbal information about the aims, purpose and use of the study and the data collection will be obtained from all participants. The study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.Trial registration numberNCT05172375.Prospero registration number287989.
“… 19 The founder of the shared care model (the Canadian Collaboration Mental Health Initiative) defined shared care as ‘collaborative mental healthcare models of practice in which consumers, their families and caregivers, together with healthcare providers from a variety of primary healthcare and mental health settings—each with different experience, training, knowledge and expertise—work together to provide better coordinated and more effective services for individuals with mental health needs’. 34 These services include mental health promotion, illness prevention, detection and treatment of mental illnesses, rehabilitation and recovery support. Shared care can encompass a broad range of activities, such as regular visits by a mental healthcare worker to a primary healthcare setting and regular telephone consultations between primary healthcare and mental healthcare providers.…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shared care is a collaboration between general practice and mental health services and enables a ‘best of both worlds’ scenario with the opportunity to provide high-quality holistic care to support the recovery process of people with mental health difficulties 19. The founder of the shared care model (the Canadian Collaboration Mental Health Initiative) defined shared care as ‘collaborative mental healthcare models of practice in which consumers, their families and caregivers, together with healthcare providers from a variety of primary healthcare and mental health settings—each with different experience, training, knowledge and expertise—work together to provide better coordinated and more effective services for individuals with mental health needs’ 34. These services include mental health promotion, illness prevention, detection and treatment of mental illnesses, rehabilitation and recovery support.…”
IntroductionMental health illness represents one of the greatest health burdens in the world. It is well documented that treatment of these illnesses could be optimised through strengthened collaboration between general practice and specialised mental healthcare services (shared care). Furthermore, involvement of users in the design of new interventions to strengthen end-user value and sustainability is key. Therefore, the aim of this study is to develop a shared care intervention in co-production with users.Methods and analysisThe study will take place at psychiatric outpatient clinics in Denmark.The project is described in four sequential steps, each informing and leading into the next: a systematic review (step 1) will be followed by an exploratory study investigating how stakeholders (general practitioners, mental healthcare staff and patients) perceive existing treatment and collaboration between general practice and mental health services. Steps 1 and 2 will inform and qualify the intervention that will be developed in step 3 as a co-creation study. Step 4 will assess the intervention in a feasibility study. Step 4 will be designed as a non-randomised intervention study with a control group with preassessments and postassessments. In total, 240 patients will be recruited. Questionnaires will be administered to the participants at their first visit to an outpatient clinic and again after 3 months. The primary outcome will be patients’ self-reported mental health status (Short Form Health Survey, SF-36) and recovery (revised Recovery Assessment Scale, RAS-R). Recruitment will take place from June 2023 to May 2024.Ethics and disseminationThe project is approved by the ethics committee (REG-016–2022). Informed consent based on written and verbal information about the aims, purpose and use of the study and the data collection will be obtained from all participants. The study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.Trial registration numberNCT05172375.Prospero registration number287989.
“…At the same time, a survey of PCPs indicated that the barriers to accessing mental health care for their patients exceed those for other specialty services, for a variety of reasons (Cunningham, 2009). As a result, various governmental agencies are encouraging greater sensitivity to behavioral and mental health issues in the primary care setting (e.g., Kates, Ackerman, Crustolo, & Mach, 2006; Kirkcaldy & Tynes, 2006; Power & Chawla, 2008).…”
Two paths have been suggested for the future evolution of professional psychology. Prescribing psychology has already been legally authorized in two states, the military, and the Indian Health Service. Primary care psychology does not require legal recognition and has been slowly growing as a career option for psychologists across the nation. Both paths have their obstacles and limitations, but both are also associated with great potential. This article provides a brief summary of the strengths and weaknesses of each path and suggests an integrated perspective for planning the future of the profession. Each is seen as complementary to the other and providing a basis for pursuing the other.Doctoral-level healthcare psychology faces several serious threats to its status quo and perhaps even its survival. The first comes from the pressures all healthcare professions are experiencing from managed care and other third-party reimbursement systems. Involvement in managed care has been associated in psychologists with longer working hours, larger caseloads, less participation in supervision, greater stress, higher rates of premature termination, reduced flexibility, and greater pressure to com-
“…In most countries, primary care is the first point of contact in the health‐care system for many individuals with mental health problems 1 . Increasingly, interprofessional primary care teams are optimally positioned to address specific mental health needs of patients along with other physical and/ behavioural needs 2,3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most countries, primary care is the first point of contact in the health-care system for many individuals with mental health problems. 1 Increasingly, interprofessional primary care teams are optimally positioned to address specific mental health needs of patients along with other physical and/ behavioural needs. 2,3 Given the high prevalence of common mental disorders (CMDs)-such as anxiety and depression-in primary care 1 and the challenges of clinical management, there is substantial benefit from the collaboration between health and mental health professionals who can work together as a team.…”
Background
Widespread policy reforms in Canada, the United States and elsewhere over the last two decades strengthened team models of primary care by bringing together family physicians and nurse practitioners with a range of mental health and other interdisciplinary providers. Understanding how patients with depression and anxiety experience newer team‐based models of care delivery is essential to explore whether the intended impact of these reforms is achieved, identify gaps that remain and provide direction on strengthening the quality of mental health care.
Objective
The main study objective was to understand patients’ perspectives on the quality of care that they received for anxiety and depression in primary care teams.
Methods
This was a qualitative study, informed by constructivist grounded theory. We conducted focus groups and individual interviews with primary care patients about their experiences with mental health care. Focus groups and individual interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Grounded theory guided an inductive analysis of the data.
Results
Forty patients participated in the study: 31 participated in one of four focus groups, and nine completed an individual interview. Participants in our study described their experiences with mental health care across four themes: accessibility, technical care, trusting relationships and meeting diverse needs.
Conclusion
Greater attention by policymakers is needed to strengthen integrated collaborative practices in primary care so that patients have similar access to mental health services across different primary care practices, and smoother continuity of care across sectors. The research team is comprised of individuals with lived experience of mental health who have participated in all aspects of the research process.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.